Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Updated National Practitioner Data Bank Reporting Requirements

By Kenneth Alan Totz, DO, JD, FACEP | on February 13, 2019 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ILLUSTRATION: Chris Whissen PHOTOS: shutterstock.com

Hospitals and other health care entities (including entities that provide health care services and engage in professional review activities through a formal peer-review process for the purpose of furthering quality health care and professional societies of health care practitioners that engage in professional review activity through a formal peer-review process for the purpose of furthering quality health care) must report any involuntary restriction, modification, curtailment, or suspension of clinical privileges that exceeds 30 days in length. Any voluntary modification of clinical privileges by the clinician while under investigation must additionally be reported to the NPDB. This would include situations whereby the physician or dentist resigns while under investigation for incompetence or improper professional conduct (eg, claims of verbal abuse). An agreement to resign in exchange for the health care entity not performing an investigation would also fall within this reporting requirement.

You Might Also Like
  • National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data Show Increase in Emergency Department Visits
  • California Bill Would Require Reporting of ‘Superbug’ Infections, Deaths
  • ACEP’s Clinical Emergency Data Registry Can Improve Quality
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 38 – No 02 – February 2019

Sanctions for Failing to Report to NPDB

Any malpractice payer that fails to report medical malpractice payments is subject to a civil money penalty of up to $11,000 for each such payment involved.

Any hospital or other health care entity that fails substantially to report adverse actions will have its name published in the Federal Register, and the organization will lose its immunity from liability under Title IV with respect to professional review activities for three years.

Any professional society that fails substantially to report adverse membership actions can lose immunity protections provided under Title IV for three years.

Any health plan failing to make a required NPDB report on an adverse action shall be subject to a civil money penalty of up to $25,000 for each adverse action not reported.

The NPDB is not just a repository for medical malpractice misadventures anymore. A criminal conviction, pattern of emotional lability in the workplace, or abrupt resignation following a bad clinical outcome could very well justify a mandatory reporting to the data bank. I would encourage all emergency physicians to at least be familiar with the NPDB guidelines, as inclusion in the data bank can adversely affect future job prospects and malpractice insurability.

NOTE: No information within this report should be construed as medical or legal advice. Independent medical and/or legal advice should be sought based on each individual’s particular circumstances.


Dr. Totz is facility medical director at First Choice Emergency Room at Adeptus Health in Texas.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: MalpracticeNational Practitioner Data BankNPDBReporting Requirements

Related

  • How Evidence-Based Medicine Strengthens Your Malpractice Defense

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Business of Emergency Medicine: Insurance Essentials

    October 9, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The AI Legal Trap in Medicine

    August 14, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The Updated National Practitioner Data Bank Reporting Requirements”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603