Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Private Equity Wave in Health Care

By Carmen Lee, MD, MAS | on September 3, 2024 | 1 Comment
Resident Voice
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Another common tactic is the sale-leaseback strategy, in which an acquired entity’s real estate is sold off to a third party who then charges it rent to use the land and facilities with the proceeds from the sale funneling back to the PE firm. In the widely publicized example of Steward Health Care, a PE-acquired hospital network with 30 hospitals across multiple states currently facing bankruptcy, sales of its real estate to Medical Properties Trust covered the entire purchase price for the PE owner Cerberus and created 800 million dollars in additional profit. Cerberus then sold the heavily indebted entity back to a group of its own doctors, and Steward is now failing to meet both rent and debt obligations.15

You Might Also Like
  • EM Physician Appointed to COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force
  • What Will Hospital, Health Care System Mergers Mean for Emergency Medicine?
  • Numbers Say Emergency Care Is One of the Best Values in Health Care
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 09 – September 2024

The same playbook seen across many industries with PE investment can have especially negative effects on the health care workforce. “Private equity is generally highly leveraged, profit focused, and has a short-term mindset,” explains Jim Dahle, MD of the White Coat Investor. “Good docs tend to be driven elsewhere, burnout levels tend to increase, and capital is used for profit rather than investing in the long-term viability of the business. Undercapitalized hospitals don’t pay their vendors, don’t maintain and purchase needed equipment and supplies, and run overly lean staffing models.” Indeed, when 156 private equity-acquired hospitals were compared to 1,560 matched controls, they lost 24 percent of their capital assets over the first two years after acquisition.16

Proponents of the private equity model argue that it can be used to identify and increase economies of scale, yet a growing body of evidence finds that both hospital and physician costs increase after private equity acquisition, and that these costs are typically passed on to the patient.6,17-18 In a 2023 systematic review, no studies showed decreased costs to patients or payors, and the effect of PE ownership on quality of care measures was “mixed to harmful,” a pattern that has continued in subsequent studies.19,20 The more granular effects of acquisitions on physician pay, for example, can be hard to quantify, as contracts, business practices, and revenues are often shrouded in secrecy.

A statement from Envision argued that their internal data shows that Envision clinicians exceed national quality benchmarks. “Our physician-led teams are guided by the delivery of high-quality, clinically-appropriate evidence-based care,” the Envision statement said. “They make hiring decisions locally in partnership with hospitals based on communities’ needs. All clinicians—no matter the stage of their career—undergo a rigorous screening process and are hired by local physician leaders if they and the clinician believe it’s a fit.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Topics: corporate medicinephysician union

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Are Physician-Led Unions the Wave of the Future?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP and ACEP Chapters Affect Change in 2025

    September 3, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “The Private Equity Wave in Health Care”

  1. September 25, 2024

    Dan Morhaim Reply

    Thanks for this excellent article. Money, not care, has become determinative in healthcare.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603