Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Pediatric Airway: Considerations and Challenges

By Matthew Turner, MD; and Jonathan Glauser, MD, MBA, FACEP | on October 11, 2024 | 0 Comment
Airway
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Preoxygenation

Pediatric patients are also significantly predisposed to hypoxemia, due to higher metabolic requirements and reduced functional residual capacity.8 According to the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children, 13 percent of all pediatric patients have desaturated prior to or during intubation, with nearly half of all difficult pediatric intubations included in that number.9

You Might Also Like
  • Zero in on Better Pediatric Airway Management
  • Four Techniques for Handling the Omega-Shaped Epiglottis
  • Oxygen Insufflated Into Lungs Can Prevent Desaturation, Aid in Emergency Airway Management
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 10 – October 2024

As soon as the team determines that RSI is required, the patient should be preoxygenated with 100 percent oxygen. If possible, the patient should be given five minutes of 100 percent oxygen on a nonrebreather mask, or eight vital capacity breaths to grant three to four additional minutes of apnea before hypoxemia sets in.7 In particularly difficult airways, organizations such as the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Collaborative recommend passive oxygenation via nasal cannula during the intubation attempt.10 Humidified, high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation during the patient’s apneic periods has also been shown to significantly delay the time to desaturation.9

Upper Airway Obstruction

Some physicians prefer using the straight Miller blade in patients younger than 4-5 years old, as it directly lifts the anteriorly shifted epiglottis to visualize the cords, while a curved Macintosh blade indirectly lifts the ligamentous connections of the epiglottis for cord visualization.8 In cases where ventilation with a face mask is warranted, an oral airway may be used to relieve any obstructions caused by posterior displacement of the tongue.8

Blade Selection

A wide range of conditions in pediatric patients, including syndromes such as Pierre Robin and Trisomy 21, can make it difficult to visualize the vocal cords.11,12 In recent years, videolaryngoscopes (VL) designed for pediatric patients have become far more available on the market. VL blades may include options for standard direct laryngoscopy (DL) blades, such as the Miller and MacIntosh designs. Hyperangulated blades—designed specifically for VL intubation—are also growing in popularity.10 However, in infants weighing less than 5 kg, VL with a standard Macintosh or Miller blade appears to be associated with a significantly greater success rate than that achieved with hyperangulated blades.13

Some studies suggest there is no significant difference between these blades in the 1-24 month age group.14 However, other studies maintain that the Miller blade is significantly more effective in intubation in pediatric patients aged 2-6 years.15 In children younger than 2 years of age, the size 1 Miller may be used to lift the epiglottis, or a Macintosh blade may be used to lift the base of the tongue.16

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalIntubationPediatrics

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The Pediatric Airway: Considerations and Challenges”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603