Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Death of Critical Thinking in Emergency Medicine

By Russell Baker, DO, FACEP, FAEMS, FAWM | on January 4, 2025 | 6 Comments
New Spin Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Baker is an associate professor at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in El Paso, Texas.

You Might Also Like
  • A Conversation with ACEP President Dr. Alison Haddock
  • Artificial Intelligence in the ED: Ethical Issues
  • 2023 ACEP Elections Preview: Meet the Board Candidates
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Jan 01

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: algorithmsClinical Guidelinesgestalt

Related

  • Putting Clinical Gestalt to Work in the Emergency Department

    October 29, 2024 - 1 Comment
  • The Corneal Abrasion Treatment Controversy

    October 10, 2024 - 3 Comments
  • ACEP’s Clinical Policy on Acute Ischemic Stroke

    May 9, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

6 Responses to “The Death of Critical Thinking in Emergency Medicine”

  1. January 5, 2025

    Norman Borlaug Reply

    Is there a reference list for this article? The author makes what would be some excellent points, but without any citations it reads like an alarmist screed devoid of any supporting evidence about practice concerns that may only exist within the author’s system and/or may not be generalizable outside of Texas.

  2. January 19, 2025

    Paul Robinson MD, PhD Reply

    In my experience, this article is spot on. I have worked in emergency departments in Florida in which the physicians did not take histories or do physical exams. These critical endeavors were the bailiwick of the nursing staff. The physicians spent their time at desks following protocols and writing admitting orders on patients they did not understand. Their primary responsibility was to assure that data collection proceeded as the nursing and administrative staff dictated. Thus do physicians become glorified clerks.

  3. January 19, 2025

    Ian Staker Reply

    “Emergency departments will become conveyor belts of impersonal care, churning out treatments.”

    I wholeheartedly agree with the author, but sadly the ship has sailed on this one. My department (staffed by a medium sized democratic group) has a chest pain pathway. If I deviate from it and a patient has a bad outcome, I guarantee the first question raised in any peer review or lawsuit will be “does your department have a pathway for chest pain, and if so, did you follow it?”

    So 25 year olds with chest pain get blanket troponin testing and anyone over age 50 with chest pain gets a d-dimer. Patient suffer, and emergency medicine loses its soul.

  4. January 19, 2025

    Ricardo Martinez Reply

    I appreciate Dr Baker’s thoughts; we don’t want to be cogs in a machine and yes, critical thinking is very important. He may not remember why we rebuilt emergency medical care for time-sensitive conditions.

    EM docs used to be the highest-paid ward clerks in the hospital – calling the cardiologist on call, for example, to see how they wanted to handle an MI that we diagnosed. Our job was to call for and assemble the resources. Cardiology would come to the ED when they got around to it. It took hours.

    Each cardiologist also felt that clinical pathways/protocols were terrible, and each sought to make independent, autonomous decisions for EM to carry out. It was frustrating at best, with delays and constant variation. It was also not evidence-based.

    There aren’t 40 “best ways” to care for stroke, MI, asthma, etc. so we learned to put aside our desire for autonomy and instead act as a team focused on the patient. Putting that approach in place has improved the timeliness and effectiveness of care. Everyone knows the game plan, and resources come to the patient or are available in a timely manner. The EM physician is the Captain of the ship until handed off

    Similarly, it used to be that emergency physicians in the same ED each cared for patients differently, according to varied training and personal preferences. Patients with similar conditions had highly varied workups and treatments changed every shift depending upon who was working.

    I appreciate Dr Baker’s thoughts on ensuring that EM physicians retain and apply critical thinking and remind our colleagues that we developed evidence-based pathways and protocols with intention. If there are reasons to deviate, then that is a professional obligation and under the purview of the EM physician.

  5. January 19, 2025

    Matthew Lipton Reply

    Excellent article. I fully agree!! This lack of critical thinking is leading to the insane overuse of CT scans too.

  6. January 20, 2025

    Thomas H. Matese Jr Reply

    Dr. Baker, as an EM residency PD I could not agree with you more, anecdotal evidence as it may be….However, in our program we spend considerable time and effort teaching our learners the curriculum of critical thinking and clinical reasoning so as to prepare them for those times when the electricity goes out and they have to “sink to the level of their training”!

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603