Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The 50-Year Evolution of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care

By W. Richard Bukata, MD | on May 30, 2018 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

1989

Demonstration That Percutaneous Transvenous Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Was Superior to Thrombolysis in STEMI

Early trials comparing PTCA (ballooning and stenting) with IV thrombolysis (streptokinase or recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) demonstrated the superiority of PTCA. In 1997, a 10-trial meta-analysis demonstrated that 30-day mortality was 4.4 percent with PTCA versus 6.5 percent with early thrombolysis.4 Most of the studies were very small in size, with GUSTO-IIb, published in 1997, being the largest (565 patients of the 2,606 total patients in the 10 randomized controlled trials).5

You Might Also Like
  • Is That Chest Pain Unstable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome?
  • How to Manage Suspected Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Studies Bolster Statin Use for Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 05 – May 2018

Dr. Richard BukataDr. Bukata is executive editor of Emergency Medical Abstracts and clinical professor of emergency medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California in Los Angeles.

To Be Continued…

Want to learn more about the history of emergency care for chest pain in 2000 and beyond? Be sure to read Part Two of this article in the ACEP 50th Anniversary Special Issue, which will be published in September and available at ACEP18.

References

  1. Hughes KE, Lewis SM, Katz L, et al. Safety of computer interpretation of normal triage electrocardiograms. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(1):120-124.
  2. Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell‘Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Lancet. 1986;1(8478):397-402.
  3. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1988;2(8607):349-360.
  4. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997;278(23):2093-2098.
  5. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1621-1628.

.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: 50th AnniversaryACEPACEP 50 YearsACSAcute Coronary SyndromeAmerican College of Emergency Physicians

Related

  • Annals ECG of the Month: Acute Coronary Occlusion

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Pancreatitis Mimics STEMI

    December 11, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • VACEP Legal Victory Illustrates Why the Prudent Layperson Standard Still Matters

    October 26, 2023 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The 50-Year Evolution of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603