Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Study Compares Standard, Vector Change and Double Sequential Defibrillation

By Ken Milne, MD | on April 3, 2023 | 0 Comment
Skeptics' Guide to EM
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

Case Resolution

The EMS paramedics add their defibrillator with pads in the anterior-posterior position and provide DSED. The patient is successfully defibrillated and transported to the local emergency department.

You Might Also Like
  • Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo Treatments Compared for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
  • New Study Compares POCUS with X-Ray for Shoulder Dislocations
  • Treatment Strategies for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 04 – April 2023

Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on the Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine.

Thank you to Dr. Seam Moore, an emergency physician working in Kenora, Ontario, for his help with this review.


William “Ken” Milne, MDDr. Milne is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project The Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine.

References

  1. Dankiewicz J, Cronberg T, Lilja G, et al. Hypothermia versus normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(24):2283–2294.
  2. Benger JR, Kirby K, Black S, et al. Effect of a strategy of a supraglottic airway device vs tracheal intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on functional outcome: The AIRWAYS-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(8):779–791.
  3. Ringh M, Rosenqvist M, Hollenberg J, et al. Mobile-phone dispatch of laypersons for CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2316–25.
  4. Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD, et al. A randomized trial of epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):711–721.
  5. Taljaard, Monica & Grimshaw, Jeremy. (2014). Concept, characteristics and implications of cluster randomization. Clinical Investigation. 4. 1–4.
  6. Lievre M, Menard J, Bruckert E, et al. Premature discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility. BMJ. 2001;322: 603–5.
  7. Bassler D, Matthias, et al. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2010;303: 1180–1187.
  8. Guyatt, GH, Briel, M, Glasziou, P, et al. Problems of stopping trials early. BMJ. 2012; 344.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalCritical CareDefibrillatorResuscitationVentricular Fibrillation

Related

  • Alcohol Use Disorder: Screening Tools and Medications in the ED

    February 10, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • Phenylephrine and Epinephrine Push-Dose Vasopressors

    February 10, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • Top Five Articles of 2025 JACEP Open

    December 10, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Study Compares Standard, Vector Change and Double Sequential Defibrillation”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603