Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Staffing an ED Appropriately and Efficiently

By ACEP Now | on August 1, 2009 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Consider the following examples of the number of patients per hour (PPH):

You Might Also Like
  • Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance Releases 2014 Data on Staffing, Physician Productivity
  • Physician Staffing Model at Texas Health ED Helps Maintain Top Clinical, Operational Metrics
  • More Advanced Practice Providers Working in Emergency Departments
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 28 – No 08 – August 2009
  • 2 PPH 8,760 hours/year = 17,520 patients per year.
  • 2.5 PPH 8,760 hours/year = 21,900 patients per year.
  • 3 PPH 8,760 hours/year = 26,280 patients per year.

So, for example, 18,000 visits during the 8,760 hours in a year equals 2.05 patients per hour, which might seem to be within an appropriate volume for a single-coverage emergency department. “However, the typical ED processes 64 percent of the daily ED patient volume from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. So during that time frame, the typical 18,000-visit ED is actually processing 2.63 PPH, or the functional equivalent of a 23,039-visit ED,” Dr. Jensen noted.

“For a single-coverage ED, consider adding coverage when ED patient volume begins to exceed 18,000 visits per year and when peak load crises and their consequences become more frequent,” he said. Such consequences include the following:

  • Elevated patient throughput times.
  • An unacceptably high left-without-being-seen rate.
  • Unacceptably low patient satisfaction.
  • Concerns about emergency department clinician behavior in a stressful environment.
  • Low rates of clinician satisfaction and retention.

Maximize the lowest-cost staffing alternatives first. When the inflection point indicates it’s time for double coverage, use the least-expensive resource that can successfully accomplish the mission.

“For an average ED, up to 30% of patients can be seen independently by a physician assistant or nurse practitioner,” Dr. Jensen said. Midlevel providers (MLPs) “are usually significantly more productive in a dedicated fast track than when they are assisting the emergency physician in the core.”

Utilizing MLPs for fast track and uncomplicated pediatric patients helps increase flexibility, independence, and productivity. “The quality of the midlevel provider is the biggest predictor of success,” Dr. Jensen added.

“Consider a team-based patient intake process—a physician sees the patient, an MLP does the processing work, and the physician discharges the patient,” Dr. Jensen suggested. This can be a way to optimize efficiency, service, and quality.

Also consider pediatric emergency physicians and emergency physician residents. “Senior-level residents are a net plus because they can actually help with flow, but first- and second-year residents tend to slow you down,” Dr. Jensen said.

“When setting goals and targets for staffing, it helps to benchmark your ED against other hospitals with similar acuity and volume,” Dr. Jensen said. “There are many sources for benchmarking data, including other EDs in your area.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Care TeamOperations

Related

  • Management of ED Crowding versus Mass Casualty Incidents: Is There an Ethical Difference?

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Scripps Mercy Hospital San Diego’s Unique ED Culture Breeds Innovation

    July 3, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • Opinion: Demand Up, Beds Down—The Emergency Dept. Crowding Crisis

    June 17, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Staffing an ED Appropriately and Efficiently”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603