Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Simulations can Reveal Deficiencies in PPE Coverage

By Linda Carroll (Reuters Health) | on April 1, 2020 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Simulations to test the effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE) may reveal shortcomings in both the equipment and in the manner that PPEs are used, a new study suggests.

You Might Also Like
  • Get Your Emergency Department Ready for COVID-19
  • ACEP16 innovatED Showcases Latest Emergency Medicine Technology, Tools, Disaster Response Simulations
  • Researchers Probe Effects of the ACA’s Expanded Coverage on EDs

Canadian researchers testing PPEs in an airway-management simulation scenario found the equipment they were using might not adequately protect medical personnel caring for a real patient with COVID-19, according to the report in the Canadian Journal of Anesthesiology.

With the help of a mannequin that could “cough” up a mixture containing Glo Germ powder, the study team ran a series of simulations involving different types of protective attire. The Glo Germ powder is a product designed to mimic the spread of microorganisms.

The powder was brushed onto the surface of the simulation mannequin and also loaded into the mannequin’s nostrils. While health care workers were working on the mannequin, it coughed up droplets containing the powder. When the workers wore reusable yellow gowns that were permeable to liquid, six out of six had visible soilage on their scrubs beneath their gowns.

During one simulation, an airway assistant wearing a disposable Advancement of Medical Instrumentation level-3 surgical gown showed no contamination of the scrubs beneath the gown, but there was significant contamination on that health care worker’s neck, on the base of the wrist, and on the lower pants and shoes.

“While skin contamination is not a method of transmission for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 responsible for causing COVID-19, these areas of soilage increase the risk for self-contamination (e.g., during doffing) via mucous membranes,” write the authors, led by Dr. Shannon Lockhart, of the department of anesthesiology at St. Paul’s Hospital and the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

The study authors did not respond to requests for comment.

Contamination could also occur while health care workers disrobed, Dr. Lockhart and her team found. The researchers suggested that the doffing process be adjusted to the types of PPEs used, and it must be practiced, they said.

In their simulations, Glo Germ was found on faces, necks, forearms and shoes after participants disrobed.

The new study underscores the importance of practicing with simulations, said Dr. Jennifer Arnold, a neonatologist and medical director of simulation at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital in Baltimore.

“One critical message is that identification of the proper PPE coverage is key to protection and testing this with simulation is a safe and effective way to optimize safety for our clinicians,” Dr. Arnold said in an email. “Additionally, this article demonstrates the challenge of performing effective donning and doffing procedures”

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: AirwaycoronavirusCOVID-19IntubationPersonal Protective EquipmentPPE

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Member Uses ED, Military Training To Set Standards at FEMA

    August 11, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Simulations can Reveal Deficiencies in PPE Coverage”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603