Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Should We Use New Blood Test to Rule Out TBI?

By Ryan Patrick Radecki, MD, MS | on April 23, 2021 | 0 Comment
Pearls From the Medical Literature
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Shutterstock.com

Conclusion

This BTI biomarker is likely to be aggressively marketed, as evidenced by boldly worded press releases such as, “Finally, A Blood Test for Traumatic Brain Injury.”6 Likewise, similarly favorable materials describing “the remarkable significance of such markers in assessing and managing neurotrauma” are added to the scientific literature through open-access review articles authored by Banyan’s founder.7

You Might Also Like
  • Revised Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decisionmaking in Adult Mild TBI in Acute Settings
  • Early Administration of Tranexamic Acid Potentially Harmful in Isolated Severe TBI
  • Are Clinical Decision Instruments for Identifying Clinically Important Traumatic Brain Injury Necessary?
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 40 – No 04 – April 2021

The molecular diagnostics market is measured in the tens of billions of dollars annually, and while there is every possibility such innovations will ultimately prove to add value, we ought to require a high bar of quality implementation data. Without demonstrating their value and safety in prospective, real-world use, these observational test characteristics are not nearly enough to justify considering the use of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury.

References

  1. Papa L, Brophy GM, Welch RD, et al. Time course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients with and without mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(5):551-560.
  2. Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation for Banyan Brain Trauma Indicator. FDA website. Accessed March 3, 2021.
  3. Bazarian JJ, Biberthaler P, Welch RD, et al. Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(9):782-789.
  4. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1391-1396.
  5. Sharp AL, Nagaraj G, Rippberger EJ, et al. Computed tomography use for adults with head injury: describing likely avoidable emergency department imaging based on the Canadian CT head rule. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(1):22-30.
  6. Finally, A Blood Test for Traumatic Brain Injury. Abbot website. Accessed March 3, 2021.
  7. Wang KKW, Kobeissy FH, Shakkour Z, et al. Thorough overview of ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase‐L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein as tandem biomarkers recently cleared by US Food and Drug Administration for the evaluation of intracranial injuries among patients with traumatic brain injury. Acute Med Surg. 2021;8(1):e622.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: BiomarkersTBITrauma & InjuryTraumatic Brain Injury

Related

  • The Critical Role of Accurate Traumatic Brain Injury Coding

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Employ a Trauma-Informed Approach to Care

    December 7, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Traumatic Coronary Artery Dissection Diagnosis Tips

    November 7, 2024 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Ryan Patrick Radecki, MD, MS

Ryan Patrick Radecki, MD, MS, is an emergency physician and informatician with Christchurch Hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand. He is the Annals of Emergency Medicine podcast co-host and Journal Club editor and can be found on Twitter @emlitofnote.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Should We Use New Blood Test to Rule Out TBI?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603