Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Is “Severe Pain” considered an emergency medical condition under EMTALA?

By Robert A. Bitterman, M.D. | on April 1, 2013 | 1 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Bitterman is president and CEO, Bitterman Health Law Consulting Group, Inc., in Harbor Springs, Mich. He is a member of the ACEP Medical Legal Committee.

You Might Also Like
  • Revised Joint Commission Standard Addresses Medical Staff, Hospital Leadership
  • ED Waiting Room Posters on Prescribing Pain Medications May Violate EMTALA
  • Whose EMTALA Is It, Anyway?
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 04 – April 2013

About LegalEase

ACEP’s Medical Legal Committee sponsors these articles addressing topics of interest to ACEP members. If you have legal questions you would like discussed in print, please submit them to Dr. Louise B. Andrew at acep@mdmentor.com. Please don’t disclose any details of a pending legal case.

If you need advice regarding litigation stress, please contact Marilyn Bromley, ACEP Director of Emergency Medicine Practice, at 800-798-1822, ext. 3231, or by email at mbromley@acep.org.

References

  1. 42 USC 1395dd(a).
  2. 42 USC 1395dd(b) and (c). It is true that EMTALA’s stabilization and transfer requirements are not triggered unless the hospital determines, after the MCE, that the individual has an emergency medical condition.
  3. Bitterman RA. Providing Emergency Care Under Federal Law: EMTALA. Published by the American College of Emergency Physicians, January 2001; Supplement 2004. Second printing.
  4. 42 USC 1395dd(e); 42 CFR §489.24(b). Emphasis added.
  5. 42 USC 1395dd(e)(1). Emphasis added.
  6. E.g., Thornton v SW Detroit Hospital, 895 F2d 1131 (6th Cir 1990); Phipps v Bristol Regional Medical Center, No 96-5786, 1997 US App LEXIS 17919 (6th Cir 1997); and Camp v Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital, 983 SW2d 876 (Tex App. 1998).]
  7. 42 USC 1395dd; 42 CFR 489.24 et seq; CMS State Operations Manual (SOM), Appendix V – Interpretive Guidelines – Responsibilities of Medicare Participating Hospitals in Emergency Cases – EMTALA, Effective May 29, 2009, with revision 60, effective July 16, 2010. At: www.cms.gov/manuals/Downloads/som107ap_v_emerg.pdf.
  8. 42 CFR §489.24(d)(4)(iv); CMS Interpretive Guidelines §489.24(d)(4)(iv).
  9. Joint Commission Standard PC.01.02.07: The hospital assesses and manages the patient’s pain.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Clinical GuidelineCMSEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEMTALALegalLegalEasePainPatient SafetyPublic PolicyQuality

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Overcoming Language Barriers in the Emergency Department

    October 21, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Event Medicine: Where Fun and Safety Sing in Perfect Harmony

    October 9, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Is “Severe Pain” considered an emergency medical condition under EMTALA?”

  1. September 17, 2018

    Peter Reply

    I wonder how many millions like myself self medicate when the pain pain is is not caused by a physical illness but is the manifestation of physical pain caused by depression or anxiety. When the pain is severe and there is no relief the patent is left to the own devices. No wonder people turn to street drugs.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603