Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Senior-Friendly Emergency Departments Combine Care-Model Innovation With Local Adaptation

By Don Melady, MSc(ED), MD, Judy Lowthian, PhD, and Christopher R. Carpenter, MD, MSc, FACEP, AGSF | on June 23, 2016 | 0 Comment
Uncategorized
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Participants Strengths Limitations
GED Boot Camp Physicians & nurses*
Physiotherapy
Pharmacy
Case managers
Community partners†
Hospital administrators
Insurers
Patients & families
Employs implementation science and QI to promote practice change

You Might Also Like
  • Senior EDs: More Than Better Lighting
  • ACEP Accredits Geriatric Emergency Care for Emergency Departments
  • New Guidelines Enhance Care Standards for Elderly Patients in the ED

Focused pre-planning and sustained follow-up with local opinion leaders

Engagement of multiple disciplines with a health care system’s hierarchy

QI work product and data stream to measure effectiveness

Time- and labor-intensive for Boot Camp sites & organizers

Expensive

Engagement of limited number of health care systems thus far

Await proof-of-concept

Senior-Friendly ED

Physicians & nurses‡
Hospital administrators
Engagement of broad array of hospitals across provinces

Linkage to large EM meetings§

QI work product

Involvement of only a few individuals from any one hospital

Await proof-of-concept

Integrated Care Symposium Physicians & nurses*
Insurers
Community partners†
Hospital administrators
Policy makers
Linkage of older persons workshop to multi-stakeholder integrated care symposium Await proof-of-concept

No individualized pre-planning or QI project


* Emergency department, hospitalists, primary care, geriatricians
† Home health services, Meals on Wheels, transportation services, Alzheimer’s Association
‡ Emergency department and geriatricians
§ ED Administration Conference, Western ED Operations Conference

As summarized in the above table, each approach has advantages and disadvantages, but each awaits definitive proof-of-concept.7

The expansion of geriatric care in EDs will continue, and we as EM providers have the opportunity to either define best practices or have best practices defined for it by others.8 Delivering high-quality, patient-centric emergency care for an aging population will remain a challenge and will require a team-based approach. A one-size-fits-all solution to bridge disciplines and create comprehensive ED geriatric care is unlikely, so the best strategy is to link innovation and providers in a multipronged approach similar to that seen in the growth of cardiac, stroke, trauma, and pediatric care.


Dr. MeladyDr. Melady is employed at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. Follow him on Twitter at @geri_EM.

Dr. LowthianDr. Lowthian is employed at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. Follow her on Twitter at @Emergedu.

Dr. CarpenterDr. Carpenter is employed at Washington University in St. Louis. Follow him on Twitter at @GeriatricEDNews.

References

  1. Lowthian JA, Curtis AJ, Cameron PA, et al. Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(5):373-377.
  2. Hogan TM, Losman ED, Carpenter CR, et al. Development of geriatric competencies for emergency medicine residents using an expert consensus process. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(3):316-324.
  3. Conroy S, Nickel CH, Jónsdóttir AB, et al. The development of a European curriculum in geriatric emergency medicine [published online ahead of print April 25, 2016]. Eur Geriatr Med. doi:10.1016/j.eurger.2016.03.011.
  4. McClelland M, Sorrell JM. Enhancing care of older adults in the emergency department: old problems and new solutions. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2015;53(3):18-21.
  5. Hwang U, Rosenberg MS, Dresden SM. Geriatrics Emergency Department – The GEDI WISE Program. In: Malone ML, Capezuti E, Palmer RM, eds. Geriatrics Models of Care: Bringing ‘Best Practice’ to an Aging America. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015:201-209.
  6. Carpenter CR, Hwang U, Rosenberg M. New Guidelines Enhance Care Standards for Elderly Patients in the ED. ACEP Now. March 6, 2014.
  7. Platts-Mills TF, Glickman SW. Measuring the value of a senior emergency department: making sense of health outcomes and health costs. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(5):525-527.
  8. Hogan TM, Olade TO, Carpenter CR. A profile of acute care in an aging America: snowball sample identification and characterization of United States geriatric emergency departments in 2013. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(3):337-346.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansElderlyEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianGeriatricPatient CareSenior

Related

  • Patterns of Injury in Elder Abuse

    November 6, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • August 2025 News from the College

    August 4, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Senior-Friendly Emergency Departments Combine Care-Model Innovation With Local Adaptation”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603