Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Screening Tool Helps Docs Evaluate Patients at High Risk of Suicide

By Maura Kelly | on February 10, 2026 | 0 Comment
Features
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

The second example, a 55-year-old man who has just lost his job. His wife arrives home to find him shaking, saying over and over again, “My head is going to explode. I don’t know what to do.” His wife sees him making phone calls, in a frantic manner, though no one picks up. Frightened by her husband’s agonized state, she takes him to the hospital, where he refuses to explain why he lost his job, something he’s also refused to discuss with his wife. In the emergency room, he asks to be discharged, arguing that he is not suicidal, never has been, and that he wants to go home and start looking for a new job.

You Might Also Like
  • The Suicide Contagion in Adolescents: What’s Emergency Medicine’s Role?
  • Is Universal Suicide Screening in the Emergency Department Saving Lives or Wasting Time?
  • Intervention During, after ED Visit May Reduce Suicide Attempts
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Despite his vehement denials about suicidality, this patient should not be sent home, according to Galynker. He is visibly agitated, showing affective disturbance and arousal. All the phone calls he made suggest he is desperately trying to solve the problem of being fired. His repeated muttering about his head exploding suggests a loss of cognitive control, specifically ruminative flooding. His refusal to tell his wife or the doctor why he lost his job are evasions that indicate feelings of social isolation.

The team that Galynker leads has applied to have SCS included as a diagnosis in the preeminent mental health manual, DSM-5. That application should be greenlighted, said Barnhorst. Others have expressed skepticism, such as Dr. Paul S. Appelbaum, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University. He recently told The New York Times that an SCS diagnosis could have a “stigmatizing effect,”  affecting a patient’s “insurability.” But Barnhorst said, “I am not a big proponent of not doing things because they might be stigmatizing.”

Corey N. Goldstein, an assistant professor at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago who is board certified in both emergency medicine and psychiatry, acknowledged that insurability is a complex question. “Now [by law] you can’t discriminate against people based on their medical history,” he pointed out. “But that could change at any moment.” An SCS diagnosis could also affect a person’s ability to get life insurance or disability insurance. Dr. Goldstein he acknowledged that stigmatization is not insignificant, adding, “If that is the case, does [an SCS diagnosis] increase safety and save lives? Because if it does that on a significant level, then it might be worth the potential downsides.”

Goldstein said he thinks there’s value in using an SCS tool. “Most emergency physicians have [an] obvious background in evaluating mental health symptoms and risk, but we all would like to improve care and our ability to really figure out who needs help, who needs to stay, and who can be discharged, because psychiatrists are not always available in hospital settings. On top of that, there are a limited number of psychiatric beds available.” SCS can help doctors make effective, efficient choices, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: Clinical toolMental HealthPsychiatricScreeningsuicidesuicide crisis syndromeSuicide Risk

Related

  • Alcohol Use Disorder: Screening Tools and Medications in the ED

    February 10, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • Pediatric Patients in Acute Mental Health Crisis Face Long Waits

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Doctors: Sharing Our Personal Health Stories Can Save a Life

    July 3, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: March 2026

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Screening Tool Helps Docs Evaluate Patients at High Risk of Suicide”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603