Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

‘Road House Rules’ for EMS Interactions in ED

By David P. Keseg, M.D. | on February 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

2. They appreciate feedback on their performance – privately! The worst thing that a nurse or ED physician can do is to question the EMS provider’s care in the presence of other staff, patients, or other EMS personnel. When the ED is bursting at the seams and EMS has just brought in the umpteenth patient that day, tempers are frayed and sometimes the EMS providers may get the brunt of the frustration simmering in the department. If there is a true concern on the part of an ED staff member about substandard care a patient received from EMS, that concern should be expressed in private in a professional and productive manner. If things could have been done better, most EMS providers sincerely want to know that information and will receive it well if it is delivered in a confidential setting that allows the individual to avoid being humiliated in the presence of his or her peers. So take the time to perform this exercise discretely and with dignity.

You Might Also Like
  • EMS the Newest Subspecialty of Emergency Medicine
  • ‘EMS Strong’ Campaign Aims to Unite, Inspire Emergency Medical Services Personnel
  • Emergency Medications Act Would Fix Gap in EMS Law That Could Harm Patients
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 02 – February 2012

disregarding the value and importance of your local EMS providers does nothing except alienate them and ultimately has an adverse effect on patient care.

3. Understand what they can do and not do in the field. EMS protocols for your local agencies should be available and accessible in your ED. If you receive a patient who had a cricothyrotomy performed and you did not know that your EMS providers could do this procedure, shame on you for not knowing this. EMS protocol should be updated on a regular basis as medications and interventions in EMS are constantly evolving. You may disagree that a certain EMS protocol is allowed, but make your concern known to the EMS Medical Director instead of yelling at the medics about it. Be ready to share scientific data on why you feel the EMS protocol is inappropriate instead of just saying “you don’t think it is right.” Constructive and productive criticism is welcomed by EMS if it results in better patient care.

4. Positive comments to them on their care is encouraging. My mother used to say “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.” Now if there is a case where the care was egregiously deficient and there really isn’t anything positive to say, that is one thing. But those cases are fortunately rare, so in the vast majority of EMS runs to your ED, you should be able to find something to compliment those EMS providers on. Even just talking to them is a plus, as many times ED staff ignore them and treat them like furniture or “ambulance drivers.” They are health care professionals who perform a very difficult job, and like you and me they enjoy receiving feedback that supports and encourages them.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Career DevelopmentCommentaryEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianPractice ManagementWorkforce

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “‘Road House Rules’ for EMS Interactions in ED”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603