Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Readers Weigh in on Emergency Medicine Certification Requirement for ACEP Membership

By ACEP Now | on September 12, 2014 | 0 Comment
Break Room
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

When I was a medical student, I considered family medicine (FM) as a residency, but I wanted to be able to treat emergencies and keep up with the latest in life-saving techniques. My faculty and mentors in the family medicine world told me, “It’s OK, you can do an FM residency but still moonlight in the ED.” As I got closer to declaring my residency desires, I found by talking to more and more EM physicians that that advice was not entirely accurate. Sure, a family doc could moonlight in a small, rural ED. But if I wanted to treat trauma, overdoses, arrests, and higher acuity, EM was the only preparation that would get me there. I committed to my specialty. Why should those who did not commit to our pathway reap the benefits?

You Might Also Like
  • Maintain Emergency Medicine Certification as Requirement for ACEP Membership
  • Open ACEP Membership to All Emergency Physicians
  • ACEP Responds to Texas Ruling on ABPS—Certification Decision Questioned
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 09 – September 2014

Should we extend membership in 2014? Well, perhaps.
Does the American College of Surgeons have non-surgeons as members? Doe the American College of Physicians have non–internal medicine docs in their membership? They do…as affiliate members only, according to their sites. I would be OK with ACEP allowing non-EM docs to join our membership, but as observers. If ACEP would extend affiliate membership to non-EM docs, I think that’s not unreasonable. However, it should be clear that such membership would never lead to Fellowship or voting privileges. These stipulations should be codified unambiguously. Otherwise, my vote is a resounding “no.”

If so many are concerned that there aren’t enough emergency physicians to man the rural EDs, maybe we need to increase the number of EM docs. Maybe the medical students that have interest in FM/IM and EM should consider committing to one specialty or do a dual residency.

I also would like to suggest a policy idea for ACEP to champion: Perhaps, if safety/quality is the big concern, as intimated by the “pro” article in this month’s ACEP Now, maybe there should be a rating system for EDs, like there are for trauma centers.

As an example, Level 1 would be an ED where the public knows that each and every physician working in that ED is a board-certified or board-eligible emergency medicine specialist. Level 2 would be where greater than, say, 80 percent of the physicians are EM boarded or eligible. Level 3 is an ER from the past where there may be good physicians working there, but they are not held out to the public as emergency physicians. Trauma goes to non trauma centers, but there is recognition that the more severe trauma should divert or be stabilized & transferred. Just a thought…

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianLetter

Related

  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • VACEP Legal Victory Illustrates Why the Prudent Layperson Standard Still Matters

    October 26, 2023 - 1 Comment
  • “If Not Me, Then Who?”

    March 16, 2022 - 4 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Readers Weigh in on Emergency Medicine Certification Requirement for ACEP Membership”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603