Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Readers Respond: Lead Poisoning, AI Ethics, and Racial Division

By Steven M. Marcus, MD, Greg Neyman, MD, FACEP, and Aida Cerundolo, MD | on March 5, 2024 | 1 Comment
Break Room Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
The Break Room

—Greg Neyman, MD, FACEP

You Might Also Like
  • Readers Respond: Antifreeze Poisoning Tests, Hemoptysis Suggestions, & More
  • Case Report: A Child with a Rash and Lead Poisoning History
  • ACEP Now Readers Comment on ACEP Ethics Committe Censure of Dr. Peter Rosen
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 03 – March 2024

Re: ‘Things Aren’t Always Black or White’ (January 2024)

Judging by Dr. Kendall’s piece, “Things Aren’t Always Black or White,” the state of racism in health care is troubling indeed. Assumptions about humans based on immutable characteristics like skin color used to be called racism. Now it’s championed under the banner of “antiracism.”

Rebuking emergency physicians about “white fragility” doesn’t improve emergency department boarding, understaffing or the morale of those trying to provide safe and compassionate care, especially in underserved areas.

No doubt there are many personal stories of racism, as discrimination and bias are human flaws that escape no one, regardless of skin color. “White people do not exist under a non-racist force field,” writes Dr. Kendall, but she is only partially correct—no one does. Pushing the idea that whites are hopelessly racist has no resolution, as it ensnares our society into endless racial division. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s words, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character,” provide a better solution.

Reducing humans to their immutable characteristics and assigning value or scorn based on these traits normalizes their dehumanization. This leads to the belief that certain humans hold more value than others—a dangerous perspective used to justify such past atrocities as forced sterilizations, the Tuskegee experiment and the Holocaust, as well as the explosion of antisemitism today.

Doctors should focus on healing all humans—regardless of skin color or any other attributes.

—Aida Cerundolo, MD

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Artificial IntelligenceEthicslead contaminationRacism

Related

  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Search with GRACE: Artificial Intelligence Prompts for Clinically Related Queries

    October 9, 2025 - 3 Comments
  • AI Scribes Enter the Emergency Department

    August 11, 2025 - 2 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Readers Respond: Lead Poisoning, AI Ethics, and Racial Division”

  1. March 10, 2024

    W. Anthony Gerard Reply

    THANK YOU Dr. Cerundulo. I think you are completely right. There is MUCH more to say about this issue, but rather than commenting further, I will reinterate: THANK YOU!

    PS- If Dr. Cerundulo’s comments bother you in any way, or you disagree- and are willing to ” do your homework”, please consider reading The End of Race Politics by Coleman Hughes. ( https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/671726/the-end-of-race-politics-by-coleman-hughes/)

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603