Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Re-Engineering Flow in an Academic Emergency Department

By Shari Welch, MD, FACEP | on November 14, 2023 | 0 Comment
Special OPs
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like
  • Segmentation Improves Emergency Department Patient Flow at Raritan Bay Medical Center
  • Pennsylvania ED Re-Engineers Patient Flow to Reduce Boarding Burden
  • Emergency Department Flow, Patient Walkaway Key Performance Measures
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 11 – November 2023

UVA Health’s Excellence Driven ED program demonstrates the power of a multidisciplinary effort combined with creative problem solving and data-driven decision making.

The important finishing touch for UVA Health’s Excellence Driven ED project was the development of real-time patient-flow leaders. The patient flow coordinator monitored flow into the department while the new charge nurse role monitored flow out of the department. These nurse leaders are tasked with overseeing everything related to patient flow. In particular, these nurse-leader roles include identifying early signs (triggers) that a zone is falling behind. This is particularly a risk in the front end of an ED. They identified strategic responses to each scenario. For instance, the physician-in-triage area can be overwhelmed by surges in arrivals. When the physician needs additional resources, another physician moves forward to help with physician-in-triage intake to get caught up. It is a short-term proposition, and such tactics around the country are often referred to as “high-flow” tactics. The overarching theme in high-flow strategies is to have standardized and articulated trigger-and-response strategies mapped out in advance, to be turned on in real time. The tactics typically involve the temporary deployment of personnel to an area to help when it is falling behind. High-flow strategies will depend on physical layout, staffing, and culture, and will be idiosyncratic to a particular ED. These real-time strategies being employed at UVA Health are cutting-edge operations and not yet embedded into many emergency department operations.

The before-and-after results of this sophisticated ED flow model are remarkable. Door-to-doctor time was reduced, but more importantly patients no longer flowed back into the waiting room, which had a profound impact on walkaways. Despite increases in year-over-year volume, all indicators show improvement in patient flow.

The operations team continues to optimize the new flow model, and multiple task forces focus on refining processes and staffing. Excellence Driven demonstrates the power of a multidisciplinary effort combined with creative problem solving and data-driven decision making.


Shari Welch, MD, FACEPDr. Welch is a practicing emergency physician with Utah Emergency Physicians and a research fellow at the Intermountain Institute for Health Care Delivery Research, in Murray, Utah. She has written articles and books on ED quality, safety, and efficiency. She is a consultant with Quality Matters Consulting, and her expertise is in ED operations.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Patient Flow

Related

  • Pediatric Patients in Acute Mental Health Crisis Face Long Waits

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Hospital at Home Is Here: An Opportunity EM Can’t Ignore

    August 25, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Management of ED Crowding versus Mass Casualty Incidents: Is There an Ethical Difference?

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Re-Engineering Flow in an Academic Emergency Department”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603