Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

“No Surprises” Insurer Tactics Reshape Emergency Medicine Reimbursement

By Leona Scott | on January 7, 2026 | 0 Comment
Features
Share:  Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Brault agrees that implementation — not the core idea of the NSA — is the problem. Emergency physicians are winning a large majority of IDR disputes — about 80 to 85 percent by many accounts — because their offers more closely reflect the real cost of care. Yet insurers still rarely come back to the table for meaningful contract negotiations.

You Might Also Like
  • Correcting Course: Repairing Gaps in the No Surprises Act
  • The No Surprises Act: How Did We Get Here?
  • How to Receive Student Loan Forgiveness
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: January 2026

Dr. Cirillo framed it as “insurer math.” Because fewer than 10 percent of underpaid out-of-network claims go to IDR, even losing 85–90 percent of arbitrations still leaves insurers ahead financially. Underpaying the other 90 percent more than offsets arbitration losses.

Dr. Abir noted that current regulations also make it difficult for groups to batch related claims, adding cost and complexity. “[Physicians] need mechanisms to reduce the cost of IDR, speed up processing, including batching, and create real consequences when insurers don’t pay correctly or on time,” she said.

When Facility Fees Rise and Professional Fees Fall

The RAND analysis quantifies something emergency physicians have sensed for years: The financial benefits of emergency care are increasingly flowing to hospital facilities, not to the clinicians delivering the care.

From 2018 to 2022, commercial-facility-allowed amounts for ED services increased by nearly 19 percent, while professional-allowed amounts fell by more than 7 percent. Nationwide, insurance claims reviewed in the report showed that although facility charges have always exceeded professional fees, the gap widened substantially over the study period. Facility charges totaled $8.7 billion compared with $1.4 billion for emergency physician services — underscoring RAND’s finding that professional reimbursement is becoming a shrinking share of overall emergency care payments.

Dr. Abir described a “pretty overwhelming consensus” that emergency medicine has undersold its value. Communities and policymakers often see only the cost, not the broader benefits of emergency departments, from public health surveillance to disaster response. When an emergency department closes, nearby hospitals and communities feel the shock. Yet the clinicians who keep those doors open are seeing their professional payments erode over time.

Dr. Brault said she believes that the facility-professional gap reinforces the need to rethink advocacy. “We’ve tended to look at payment one claim at a time,” she says. “The RAND report pushes us to think more broadly about how society funds a system that everyone relies on, often unexpectedly.”

The Next Policy Battleground: NSA Enforcement

Given the misalignment between IDR’s intent and real-world performance, emergency medicine groups are pushing for stronger enforcement. A key example is H.R. 9572, the proposed No Surprises Act Enforcement Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of physicians in Congress in September 2024. The bill would require insurers that fail to pay IDR awards on time to pay interest and penalties on overdue amounts.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Independent Dispute ResolutionNo Surprises ActRAND ReportReimbursement

Related

  • ACEP Pushes Back on Anthem Out-of-Network Penalty and Calls Out Insurer Bad Behavior

    December 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to ““No Surprises” Insurer Tactics Reshape Emergency Medicine Reimbursement”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603