Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Navigating Strict State Abortion Laws

By John Bedolla, MD, FACEP | on January 5, 2025 | 1 Comment
Medicolegal Mind
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Arkansas

Statute: A.C.A. § 5-61-301, et seq.

You Might Also Like
  • The Emergency Department After the Fall of Roe: Are You Prepared?
  • Point/Counterpoint: Abortion in the Emergency Department
  • Self-Managed Abortion: Legal Considerations for Emergency Physicians
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Jan 01

Exemptions: Only instances to save the life of the pregnant woman. Excludes procedures aimed at removing a deceased fetus from spontaneous abortion or treating ectopic pregnancies.

Suggestions: Document ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous miscarriage with a significant threat to the mother’s life. Conditions endangering the mother’s life or causing severe health risks may also qualify for exceptions.

Idaho

Statute: I.C. § 18-501 et seq.

Exemptions: Substantial risk for death or serious risk for an irreversible impairment of a bodily function to the pregnant woman (not including psychological or emotional conditions).

Suggestions: Document the threat to the mother’s life or bodily function.

Indiana

Statute: Ind. Code § 16-34-2-1

Exemptions: Treatment necessary to prevent death or serious health risk to the pregnant woman. Broad license to treat medical emergencies that threaten the mother’s life or bodily function.

Suggestions: Document and certify regarding the serious health risk to the mother’s life or bodily function posed by the disease. For ectopic pregnancy, mention the threat to life/health and evidence supporting that medical treatment may prevent surgery and enhance future fertility.

Kentucky

Statute: KRS § 311.772

Exemptions: Treatment necessary to prevent death, substantial risk for death, or serious impairment of a life-sustaining organ of the pregnant woman.

Suggestions: Document the threat to the mother’s life or bodily function. For ectopic pregnancy, mention the life/health threat and evidence supporting that medical treatment may prevent surgery and enhance future fertility.

Louisiana

Statute: La. R.S. § 40:1061, et seq.

Exemptions: Treatment necessary to prevent death, substantial risk for death, or serious impairment of a life-sustaining organ of the pregnant woman.

Suggestions: Document the threat to the mother’s life or bodily function. For ectopic pregnancy, note the life/health threat and evidence supporting that medical treatment may prevent surgery and enhance future fertility.

Mississippi

Statute: Miss. Code Ann.§ 41-41-31, et seq.

Exemptions: Treatment to remove a deceased fetus. Treatment necessary to preserve the pregnant person’s life or prevent serious impairment of a life-sustaining organ, where waiting 24 hours would create grave peril of immediate and irreversible loss of major bodily function.

Suggestions: Document fetal death or the life/health threat. For ectopic pregnancy, mention the life/health threat and evidence supporting that medical treatment may prevent surgery and enhance future fertility.

Oklahoma

Statute: 63 Okla. St. § 1-745.5

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: AbortionClinicalCritical CareLegal

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Physicians Step Up for Women

    October 15, 2025 - 4 Comments
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “Navigating Strict State Abortion Laws”

  1. January 26, 2025

    Antony Hsu, MD Reply

    Thanks for moving this forward! For your fellow ED docs at your shop, please share this article and a copy/paste-able smart phrase that can be shared. Note that the following phrase is not vetted but your site medical director and you could consider reviewing with legal counsel to be triple-sure about the appropriateness.

    “I am concerned about the life-threatening risks to the patient due to delays in treatment for *** (e.g. PPROM, impending sepsis, ectopic pregnancy resulting in hemorrhagic shock) and so am initiating *** (e.g.medication, a specialist consult, transfer to nearest capable facility). Patient (***and their family) states that they understand the risks, benefits and alternatives and agrees with the plan.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603