Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Mid-Year Q&A with ACEP President Dr. Chris Kang

By Cedric Dark, MD, MPH, FACEP | on July 6, 2023 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Third is the receptiveness of the rest of the health care community. And as we’ve seen, our nursing colleagues, whether it’s violence, burnout, or overall staffing models has also been impacted, as well as some of our other health care professionals.

You Might Also Like
  • Catching Up with ACEP President Dr. Chris Kang
  • A Mid-Year ACEP Overview with President Dr. Gillian Schmitz
  • Dr. Christopher Kang Chosen ACEP President-Elect
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 07 – July 2023

Let’s get into some of the solutions that I’ve seen proposed around the country. There was this shooting in a school in Tennessee recently, in recent months, and some of the lawmakers there are talking about investing in a system to help EDs recognize where there might be open psychiatric beds earlier on. Do you think that something as simple as that, just making sure that EDs have the ability to identify open psychiatric beds in nearby communities is a solution that would work at all for this crisis?

Dr. Kang: I think that is a key starting point. During the COVID-19 pandemic, as many readers may be aware, regional care coordination, including Washington State, the Los Angeles area, San Antonio, and Michigan, started utilizing these systems to identify available beds including critical care beds as well as ventilators to be able to distribute patients accordingly. That model has continued to be embraced by some parts of the federal government. And just a couple of days ago we had a meeting with American Psychiatric Association and their members and they also identified the need to be able to better understand where those beds are available. There is a precedent that’s set. The catch now becomes, is it private versus public beds? What’s really available? What happens when we’re short adolescent beds or geriatric psych beds? And then is it just a region or does this now look to include neighboring states?

Talking about mental health, we also need to talk about ourselves as physicians as well. We’re back-to-back burnout champions, according to reports from Medscape, which is a dubious honor to have, what are we doing to prevent the three-peat?1

Dr. Kang: This is not one of those cases to be proud of being number one. In terms of burnout itself, I think we need to identify a couple of different factors. One of them is we need to acknowledge it’s happening. There’s a mantra before, and it’s also associated with ED violence and other hardships that we endure that it’s part of what you do. Some things are not acceptable, as we’ve talked about with ED violence. Part of it is then understanding what are the causes. For everybody, it’s an individual thing.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Topics: ACEP LeadershipDr. Christopher S. Kang

Related

  • 2024 ACEP Elections Preview: Meet the Board of Directors Candidates

    September 5, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Checking In with ACEP President Terry

    September 5, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Board Meeting Tackles Current Issues, Practice Trends

    June 14, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Mid-Year Q&A with ACEP President Dr. Chris Kang”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603