Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Members Help NEMPAC Identify Pro-EM Candidates

By Martha Collins, ACEP News Contributing Writer | on June 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Rosenau has attended local fundraisers for his congressman on behalf of NEMPAC. “Recently, my congressman called and said, ‘I’d like to go to breakfast with you, and please bring along any other emergency physicians you’d like to bring,’ ” Dr. Rosenau said. “That only happens because of the fact that we combine our individual contributions into a major influence by joining together through NEMPAC.”

You Might Also Like
  • NEMPAC—30 Years as Your Advocate
  • NEMPAC Contributions Vital During Election Year
  • NEMPAC Keeps Pace as Elections Near
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 06 – June 2010

In an open-seat election, in which neither candidate is an incumbent, input from the state chapter, local ACEP leaders, and 911 Network members is critical. And discussing ACEP’s legislative agenda with candidates for open seats can be a key factor in gauging their support of emergency medicine.

In 2008, when all of New Mexico’s congressional representatives ran for an open Senate seat, it meant all three of the state’s House seats were also open for that election cycle.

“It was an opportunity to bring the issues of emergency medicine to all of the candidates running for the open seats,” said Dr. David P. Sklar, Chairman of the ACEP Board of Directors.

“Dr. Pam Cutler, President of New Mexico ACEP, and I met either individually or together with various candidates to talk about emergency department boarding, the uninsured, disaster medicine, and other issues. And we asked whether they’d support the Access to Emergency Medical Services Act,” Dr. Sklar said.

They ended up recommending NEMPAC support for candidates in two House races and in the Senate race.

“We were able to go to NEMPAC and say, ‘Here’s what’s happening in New Mexico.’ And there was a rapid response from NEMPAC. They were interested in the fact that we were having direct contact with the candidates,” Dr. Sklar said.

As the election approaches and the competitiveness of each race becomes clearer, NEMPAC can have a greater impact by making contributions to candidates who face a difficult election. “In one case, the candidate was running out of money, so I think our NEMPAC support helped him to get over the top and win,” Dr. Sklar said.

Dr. Sklar added that NEMPAC is bipartisan and “willing to support candidates of either party as long as they understand the issues, because we don’t think emergency medicine is a Democratic or a Republican issue. It’s really an issue for everybody.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACAACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEMTALAHealth Care ReformLeadershipMedicaidMedicareNEMPACObamacarePoliticsPublic Policy

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP4U: the ACEP/CORD Teaching Fellowship

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Announces Michael Fraser, PhD, MS, CAE, as Executive Director

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Members Help NEMPAC Identify Pro-EM Candidates”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603