Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Maryland Implements Value-Based Alternative Payment Model

By Andrew Leubitz, DO, MBA; and Jesse M. Pines, MD, MBA, MSCE, FACEP | on December 10, 2023 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In January 2023, the state of Maryland launched the first-ever government-based emergency medicine alternative payment model. An alternative payment model is a different way of paying for physician services from the usual model: see a patient, send a bill, and get paid, also known as fee-for-service. In the program, Medicare patients who visit a participating emergency department (ED) with specific diagnoses will have their 14-day total cost of care measured across all settings by the state regulatory agency, also known as the Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC). The ED diagnoses chosen for the program include conditions like chest pain, syncope, pneumonia, and others where there are differences between physicians in which patients get admitted, i.e., admissions that seem at times subjective.1 In total, the program includes 535 ED diagnoses. Broad categories of diagnoses in the 2023 model are listed on the related chart. If Medicare patients have any of those diagnosis when they enter a participating ED, they are included in the cost calculations.2 More than 600 emergency department (ED) clinicians in the state are participating in the program.

You Might Also Like
  • Maryland’s Global Payment Model on Track to Meet Medicare Savings Target After One Year
  • Maryland Hospitals Feel Impact of Global Budget Revenue Model
  • ACEP Proposes a Physician-Focused Alternative Payment Model
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 12 – December 2023

Here’s How It Works

Average 14-day Medicare costs of care by diagnoses are measured at the hospital-level and calculated by the HSCRC. This includes the ED visit, hospital admission (should it occur), and any post-acute costs. These costs are compared to 2019 costs, adjusted for inflation, which is also calculated by the HSCRC. If costs are reduced more than 3 percent relative to the baseline, participating physician groups will receive a proportion of the savings. As an example, let’s say 14-day costs for chest pain–one of the included diagnoses—for a physician group were $3,000 on average in 2019. In 2023, that number falls to $2,500 based on ED protocols to increase outpatient management and safely avoid hospital admission. The physician group gets a certain proportion of the $500 savings for each chest pain patient—either 20, 50 percent, or 80 percent. That proportion is determined by the state regulatory agency based on how efficient the group was in 2019, compared to other groups in the state. So, let’s say the group sees 500 chest pain patients in 2023, saves $500 on each, gets 50 percent of the savings back. That means the group gets a payment of $125,000 from the state. Importantly, there are no penalties if costs rise in this model; that is, if the cost goes from $3,000 in 2019 to $3,500 in 2023.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: fee for servicePractice ManagementReimbursement & Codingvalue-based care

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Maryland Implements Value-Based Alternative Payment Model”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603