Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Gradually Circling Around the GRACE Project’s “Reasonable Practice”

By Ryan Patrick Radecki, MD, MS | on August 22, 2023 | 0 Comment
Pearls From the Medical Literature
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The implication of such a call is magnified by the scope of the training. In the studies in which clinicians accurately applied the HINTS examination, the training consisted of an initial six hours of lectures and workshops which was repeated seven months later. It is costly to ask the entire emergency-medicine workforce to undergo specialized training with an in-person workshop, let alone a second, followup episode. There is no evidence yet whether other training frameworks are adequate, nor is there evidence to inform the frequency or intensity with which HINTS skills require reinforcement. Absent an easier path forward for upskilling the workforce, the reliance of GRACE-3 on HINTS to inform its practice recommendations limits its present real-world application.

You Might Also Like
  • New Guidelines Aim to Help the Evaluation of Chest Pain
  • ACEP Committees and Sections Tackle Big Projects
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines Updated for Diagnosing, Treating Pediatric Bronchiolitis
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 08 – August 2023

These are just the initial pieces of work under the banner of attempting to inform “reasonable” care in the emergency department. The most striking aspect of most of this work is how little evidence directly informs the sorts of decisions facing clinicians every day. Having identified these gaps provides a road map for future research, and one hopes some of these questions can be revisited in the future with more robust recommendations.


Dr. Radecki

Dr. Radecki is an emergency physician and informatician with Christchurch Hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand. He is the Annals of Emergency Medicine podcast co-host and Journal Club editor and can be found on Twitter @emlitofnote.

References

  1. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. About SAEM. SAEM website. Accessed July 14, 2023.
  2. Musey PI, et al. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low‐risk chest pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(7):718-744.
  3. Broder JS, et al. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 2 (GRACE‐2): Low‐risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022;29(5):526-560.
  4. Edlow JA, et al. Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE‐3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2023;30(5):442-486.
  5. Westafer, L. New guidelines aim to help the evaluation of chest pain. ACEP Now. 2021;40(9):17.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalClinical GuidelinesGRACE guidelinesPractice ManagementQuality & Safety

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Gradually Circling Around the GRACE Project’s “Reasonable Practice””

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603