Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Federal Government Declares Emergency Physicians Incapable of Performing Medical Screening Exam for Psychiatric Patients in AnMed Lawsuit

By Robert A. Bitterman, MD, JD, FACEP | on October 17, 2017 | 2 Comments
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices
  • Is Involuntary Hold for Psychiatric Patients the Only Answer?
  • Washington Chapter ACEP Brings Fight Against Psychiatric Boarding to the Courts
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 10 – October 2017

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Topics: AnMed HealthCMSEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysiciansEMTALALawsuitLegallegislationMedical ExamMedicareMedicare & MedicaidMental HealthPatient BoardingPsychiatricPsychology and Behavioral DisorderPublic HealthPublic PolicyregulationScreeningSouth CarolinaViolation

Related

  • Opinion: Physicians Must Reduce Plastic Waste

    December 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ABEM’s New Physician Certification Portal Includes Waiver Clause

    October 23, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

2 Responses to “Federal Government Declares Emergency Physicians Incapable of Performing Medical Screening Exam for Psychiatric Patients in AnMed Lawsuit”

  1. October 23, 2017

    Charles A. Pilcher MD FACEP Reply

    I look forward to hearing “the rest of the story.” Something is truly amiss here.

    • December 10, 2017

      bob Reply

      Here ya go:

      modernhealthcare.com/article/20170705/NEWS/170709977

      “The patients — most of whom were suicidal and/or homicidal and suffered from serious mental illness — were held in the ED from six to 38 days. In each of these incidents, AnMed had on-call psychiatrists and beds available in its psychiatric unit to evaluate and stabilize the patients. But it but did not provide examination or treatment by a psychiatrist, according to the settlement agreement.”…

      …”AnMed’s policy was that if a patient should be involuntarily committed and did not have financial resources, the attending physician could write an order for the local mental health center to evaluate the patient for commitment to the state mental health system after the patient is medically stable, according to the settlement.”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603