Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

The Enemy Should Not Be Us! – We Have Met the Enemy, Part III

By Louise B. Andrew, M.D., J.D. | on September 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

More than 60% reported that their compensation schedule as an expert varied depending on whether testimony was required.

You Might Also Like
  • We have met the enemy (Part I)
  • We have met the enemy (Part II)
  • The EP in the Courtroom: Expert Witness Testimony
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 09 – September 2013

Because of antitrust considerations, ACEP does not and could not legally suggest a fee schedule for members who serve as expert witnesses.

It appears from other specialties that there is essentially no limit to what an expert can demand, which is one of the reasons that expert testimony has become such a popular sideline. However, any expert should be prepared to explain to a jury the basis for the fee schedule that they follow.

Nearly three-quarters of our survey respondents reported that the fact of their participation as an expert witness had never been made public in any way, and more than half (54%) believed that their expert testimony had never been reviewed by anyone. No respondent reported that their testimony had been sanctioned by anyone.

ACEP has two mechanisms for review of expert testimony. The first is contained in the Procedures for Addressing Charges of Ethical Violations and Other Misconduct (www.acep.org/Clinical—Practice-Management/Procedures-for-Addressing-Charges-of-Ethical-Violations-and-Other-Misconduct).

The second is the Procedures for Review of Testimony Regarding the Standard of Care in Emergency Medicine (www.acep.org/Clinical-Practice-Management/Procedure-for-Review-of-Testimony-Regarding-Standard-of-Care-in-Emergency-Medicine).


Dr. Andrew is a past Council Speaker, chair of the ACEP Well-Being Committee, a senior member of the Medical Legal Committee and the editor of LegalEase. She is a founder and past president of the Coalition and Center for Ethical Medical Testimony and the principal of www.MDMentor.com, which assists physicians dealing with medical legal issues. In the first two installments of this Expert Witness series, Dr. Andrew’s J.D. credential was inadvertently omitted. ACEP News regrets the error.

About LegalEase: ACEP’s Medical Legal Committee sponsors these articles addressing topics of interest to ACEP members. If you have legal questions you would like discussed in print, please submit them to Dr. Louise B. Andrew at acep@mdmentor.com. Please don’t disclose any details of a pending legal case.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPLegalMalpractice

Related

  • How Evidence-Based Medicine Strengthens Your Malpractice Defense

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Business of Emergency Medicine: Insurance Essentials

    October 9, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault Presentation Varies

    August 25, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “The Enemy Should Not Be Us! – We Have Met the Enemy, Part III”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603