Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergent Evaluation and Management Of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

By ACEP Now | on January 1, 2010 | 0 Comment
CME CME Now
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

All patients with presumed PID should have a pregnancy test, as PID in pregnancy is an indication for hospitalization, and ectopic pregnancy and septic abortion are in the differential diagnosis of PID.

You Might Also Like
  • Critical Issues in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department in Early Pregnancy
  • Evaluation and Management of Suspected Appendicitis
  • Critical Decisions: Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease – Part Two
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 29 – No 01 – January 2010

A urinalysis is helpful to exclude urinary tract infection.

Of note, an elevated WBC count is not a CDC criterion for diagnosis, because fewer than two-thirds of women with PID have a WBC count of more than 10,000 cells/mcL.16

As the clinical diagnosis of PID is imprecise due to the nonspecific nature of the presenting signs and symptoms, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that health care providers maintain a low threshold for diagnosis and empiric treatment for patients with presumed PID.

Recent guidelines recommend treatment for any patient who has lower abdominal tenderness on palpation, adnexal tenderness, and cervical motion tenderness in the absence of an established cause other than PID.15

Treatment

While PID was originally considered an indication for hospital admission and parenteral therapy, there is now a dominant trend toward outpatient treatment.

Currently, just 10%–25% of women diagnosed with PID are hospitalized.17 The CDC has established these criteria as indications for hospitalization:

pregnancy, lack of response to or intolerance of oral medications, nonadherence to therapy, severe clinical illness, pelvic abscess, or possible need for surgical intervention.18

Because the efficacy both of oral and parenteral therapies has been supported by randomized clinical trials, decisions concerning appropriate antimicrobial therapy are influenced instead by cost, allergy history, and resistance patterns.19

Regardless of whether oral or parenteral therapy is used, the CDC recommends a 14-day course of antibiotics.15

Recommended outpatient regimens include:15

  • Ceftriaxone (250 mg IM) plus doxycycline (100 mg p.o. b.i.d. for 14 days).
  • Cefoxitin (2 g IM) with probenicid (1 gram p.o. once) plus doxycycline (100 mg p.o. b.i.d. for 14 days).
  • Any other third-generation cephalosporin in a single IM dose combined with doxycycline for 14 days.

The decision of whether to add metronidazole to the treatment regimen is addressed in the controversies section.

As of 2007, the CDC no longer recommends the use of fluoroquinolones as first-line therapy for PID, given increasingly high rates of gonorrheal resistance.15 Thus, outpatient therapy in the truly cephalosporin-allergic patient is very limited.

Depending on the severity of illness, the most effective treatment regimen is admission for parenteral therapy with clindamycin plus gentamicin.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Topics: Abdominal and GastrointestinalAntibioticClinical ExamClinical GuidelineCMEDiagnosisEducationEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianImaging and UltrasoundPainPractice ManagementProcedures and SkillsTechnologyUrogenital

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Emergent Evaluation and Management Of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603