Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Medicine Deserves to “Re-Brand” Itself as a Cost Saver

By Gary Gaddis, MD, PhD, FIFEM, FACEP | on July 6, 2023 | 0 Comment
New Spin Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

To enable this vision and further enhance our role toward cost savings will require emergency medicine researchers to complement validated CDRs with the creation, testing and validation of accurate and persuasive patient-education tools, sufficient to dissuade most patients from dogmatic and erroneous beliefs regarding imaging. Emergency physicians have exploded incorrect dogmas before. For instance, consider the previous dogmatic belief that no abdominal-pain patient can be administered an opiate until they have been examined by a surgeon.13 Hopefully, patients’ beliefs regarding radiographs can also become consigned to the dustbin of history.

You Might Also Like
  • The ER is a Cost-Effective Place to Receive Acute Care
  • A Cost-effective Way to Evaluate Patients with Recurrent Renal Colic
  • Value of Emergency Medicine
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 42 – No 07 – July 2023

In re-branding ourselves, we should also work to explode other myths that plague us, by refuting certain misleading beliefs that cause the public to conclude wrongly that ED care is a larger source of health care expenditures than is the case.

“A New Spin” is the personal perspective of the author and does not represent an official position of ACEP Now or ACEP.

Brian Zink captured a wonderful initial vision statement for our specialty with the title of his book, “Anyone, Anything, Anytime,” which documented the history of our specialty. In 2023 we must move beyond that title. Emergency physicians help not only save lives, but also save significant sums of money, 24/7/365. Might I suggest: Emergency Medicine: Saving lives, but also dollars, with our quick, efficient, and effective care.


Dr. Gaddis is a “PGY-37” who has stepped away from full-time employment after a 32-year full-time career in academic emergency medicine, and now works a limited number of shifts in a rural Critical Access hospital in Missouri. He also currently serves as a professor of Biomedical and Health Informatics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, and enjoys exploring contrarian views of issues that impact the specialty of emergency medicine.

References

  1. Herness J, Buttolph A, Hammer NC. Acute pyelonephritis in adults. A review. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102:173-180.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). CDC website: Sexually Transmitted Disease Guidelines 2021. Updated September 21, 2022. Accessed June 10, 2023.
  3. Mayo Clinic Staff. Warfarin side effects. Watch for interactions. The Mayo Clinic website. February 22, 2022. Accessed June 10, 2023.
  4. Stubblefield WB, Kline JA. Outpatient treatment of emergency department patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism. Postgrad Med. 2021;133(Supp 1):11-19.
  5. Gulati M, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:e187-e285.
  6. Stiell IG, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993; 269:1127-32.
  7. Stiell IG, et al. Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. JAMA. 1996;275:611-5.
  8. Hoffman JR, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94-9.
  9. Stiell IG, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510-8.
  10. Schonfeld D, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network head injury clinical prediction rules are reliable in practice. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99:427-31.
  11. Stiell IG, et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 2005;294:1511-8.
  12. Sheppard JP, et al. Risk of brain tumor induction from pediatric head CT procedures. A systematic literature review. Brain Tumor Res Treat. 2018;6:1-7.
  13. Brewster GS, Herbert ME, Hoffman JR. Medical myth: Analgesia should not be given to patients with an acute abdomen because it obscures the diagnosis. West J Med. 2000;172:209-10.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: Practice Management

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Emergency Medicine Deserves to “Re-Brand” Itself as a Cost Saver”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603