Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Medical Services Arrivals, Admission Rates to the Emergency Department Analyzed

By James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP | on December 17, 2014 | 0 Comment
Benchmarking
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The ambulances keep rolling, and for many years, the majority of their trips ended with a patient entering the emergency department. But a new paradigm is evolving, and it is likely that significant changes are ahead in the relationship between the providers of emergency medical services (EMS) and the ED.

You Might Also Like
  • National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data Show Increase in Emergency Department Visits
  • ‘EMS Strong’ Campaign Aims to Unite, Inspire Emergency Medical Services Personnel
  • Segmentation Improves Emergency Department Patient Flow at Raritan Bay Medical Center
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 12 – December 2014

The 2013 Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance (EDBA) data survey gathered performance measures from more than 1,300 participating EDs. This survey has a 10-year trend line demonstrating that a very consistent percentage of ED patients arrive on an ambulance stretcher and that a large number of those patients will receive diagnostic testing in the ED, initial treatment, and then admission to an inpatient unit of that hospital or another one offering a higher level of service.

Table 1.

(click for larger image)
Table 1.

Specifically, the EDBA survey asked member EDs to report the percentage of patients who arrive by EMS and those who arrive by EMS and are admitted from the ED to the hospital. EMS arrival rates are higher in those EDs with larger volumes and by far highest in EDs serving adults, where about 23 percent of patients arrive in an ambulance. Ambulance arrival rates average around 12 percent in smaller-volume EDs and about 8 percent in EDs that serve only pediatric patients.

In 2013, about 17 percent of patients seen in the ED arrived by EMS, a percentage that has been very consistent over the last 10 years. There is close correlation between EMS arrival and the overall admission rate from the ED, as shown in Table 1, with larger-volume and adult-serving EDs having higher admission rates and higher EMS arrival rates.

There are evolving models of unscheduled care that have EMTs and paramedics providing a variety of patient care services outside of the traditional transportation model.

Trending the EDBA data over the past 10 years finds that EMS arrivals and admission rates are very stable and that patients arriving by ambulance continue to represent higher acuity than those arriving in a private automobile or other conveyance. Table 2 demonstrates that about 39 percent of EMS-arriving patients are admitted. That means patients arriving by other means have a significantly lower admission rate, at about 12.5 percent.

Table 2.

(click for larger image)
Table 2.

There are evolving models of unscheduled care that have EMTs and paramedics providing a variety of patient care services outside of the traditional transportation model. The term that has been applied is mobile integrated healthcare practice (MIHP). This is a novel and evolving health care delivery platform intended to serve a range of patients in the out-of-hospital setting by providing patient-centered and team-based care using mobile resources. This has included programs to provide follow-up care for patients released from inpatient status back to their home, patients with recurrent admissions for long-term health problems like congestive heart failure, and patients with a variety of health problems who have demonstrated frequent use of EMS service in the past.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Emergency MedicineEmergeny DepartmentOperationsPractice TrendsWorkforce

Related

  • The Emergency Physician Job Market 2025-26

    October 15, 2025 - 2 Comments
  • A Follow-Up Conversation with ACEP President Dr. Alison Haddock

    August 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • September 2025 News from the College

    August 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP

James J. Augustine, MD, FACEP, is national director of prehospital strategy for US Acute Care Solutions in Canton, Ohio; clinical professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio; and vice president of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Emergency Medical Services Arrivals, Admission Rates to the Emergency Department Analyzed”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603