Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Emergency Interventions for Treating Cardiac Electrical Storms

By Terrance McGovern, DO, MPH, and Justin McNamee, DO | on November 18, 2015 | 3 Comments
CME CME Now Tricks of the Trade
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You are down by five, and there are only three seconds left in the game with 80 yards to go. Do you just take a knee or take a shot down the field with a Hail Mary since there is nothing else to lose? Similar to professional football players, we are professional “resuscitationists.” When it comes to taking care of cardiac arrest patients, we cannot be limited to the playbook of advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS). Occasionally, we, too, have to take a shot with our own version of a Hail Mary. Do we terminate the refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) coding patient with an end tidal CO2 of 27 mmHg, or is there a new “play” we can try before we pronounce the patient?

You Might Also Like
  • Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo Treatments Compared for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
  • Is Dual-Shock Approach Dangerous to Defibrillators?
  • Treatment Strategies for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 11 – November 2015
Introducing CME NowACEP Now features one article each issue related to an ACEP eCME CME activity.

Log on to the ACEP eCME CME site to complete the activity for this article and earn free AMA PRA Category 1 Credit.

Case

A 43-year-old father of two presents to the ED via advanced life support (ALS) in cardiac arrest with a presenting rhythm of ventricular fibrillation. According to the transporting paramedics, the patient had a witnessed arrest at home, and the family performed CPR until basic life support (BLS) arrived on the scene. An automated external defibrillator (AED) was immediately placed with “shock advised.” Two shocks were given by BLS prior to ALS arrival. The paramedics were able to intubate the patient and initiate ACLS. They report continued ventricular fibrillation, without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), from the time of arrival on scene until arrival in the ED. A total of 450 mg amiodarone, 5 mg epinephrine, two ampules of calcium chloride, two ampules of sodium bicarbonate, 100 mg lidocaine, and seven defibrillations were given prior to arrival in the ED. End-tidal CO2 has remained around 25 mmHg with high-quality CPR performed in the prehospital setting. All eyes turn to you upon arrival. “Doc, what else can we do? There are no more steps on the ACLS card but more epinephrine and defibrillations. Should we call it?”

The Opponent: Electrical Storm

Electrical storm (ES) is described in the medical literature as a rapidly clustering ventricular fibrillation that necessitates multiple cardioversions in which conventional antidysrhythmic drug therapy, as recommended by ACLS, fails to convert the patient to a life-sustaining rhythm. ES patients are commonly given antidysrhythmic medications serially while also receiving repeated shocks via an AED. However, despite heroic efforts made by all providers, most ES patients die.1 Refractory arrest secondary to ES is not a new

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: Cardiac ArrestCardiovascularCMECritical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianProcedures and Skills

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

3 Responses to “Emergency Interventions for Treating Cardiac Electrical Storms”

  1. January 13, 2016

    Steven Sawyer Reply

    I read this article this past weekend and knew that even though I had never seen a case of refractory Vfib I knew I would shortly. So I was not actually surprised when the 45 year old man brought in cardiac arrest had Vfib for which he had received two doses of epi and three shocks by ems. An LMA was in place and while cpr continued I had to wait to see the monitor. During a change in compression hands I saw the fine vfib and delivered another defib with epi and amiodarone to no avail. During the next cycle I had a chance to brief the team on the article I had read and get a copy so we could check the dose of Esmolol while maxing the amiodarone and applying the 5th shock. However, it turned out that we had no Esmolol in the ED. At this point it was 30 since being found down. I set the two defibrillators and performed the double sequential external defibrillation which initially converted from fine vfib to asystole After additional CPR and an additional attempt the code was called. It turned out that the pt had initially been over come with carbon monoxide which lead directly to his cardiac dysrhythmia. Had I known this I may have elected to remove the LMA and intubate for better oxygen support. But overall my team was fast and compliant with the strange instructions I gave. It just didn’t work this time.

  2. March 7, 2017

    günther krumpl Reply

    0–100 mcg/kg/hr (0–0.1 mg/kg/hr)

    Please correct the text in the publication to the right dose which should be

    0-100 mcg/kg/min.

    In addition I want to mention that 0 in 0-100 makes no sense, the starting dose of esmolol is 50. So it should say 50-100 …

    • April 14, 2017

      Dawn Antoline-Wang Reply

      Thank you, the article has been updated to indicate mcg/kg/min instead of mcg/kg/hr.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603