Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

eFAST 2.0: Refining an Integral Trauma Exam

By Nathaniel Leu, MD, MS; Daniel Mantuani, MD, MPH; Maximiliano Sobrero, MD, MS; Arun Nagnev, MD | on September 9, 2022 | 0 Comment
Sound Advice
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Summary

The eFAST examination has become a cornerstone of the evaluation of the critically ill trauma patient. The clinical context of the injury and hemodynamic status must be incorporated into the order and interpretation of the exam components. Utilize the “three box” concept as a framework and modify the order of the eFAST components depending on the mechanism of trauma and the patient’s clinical status. Proper and granular communication of ultrasound findings should be relayed to your trauma colleagues and interpreted in the hemodynamic clinical context of the patient. Finally, when faced with the newly or persistently hypotensive patient after an initially negative eFAST exam, a structured algorithm should be employed to reduce cognitive load in an often stressful situation. Our simple additions to the eFAST examination in no way replace the amazing work done by numerous physicians who have brought this life-saving tool into trauma care, but rather a minor refinement to an integral exam in modern trauma resuscitation.

You Might Also Like
  • EFAST—Extended Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma
  • Evidence Behind Focused Sonography for Trauma During Pregnancy
  • ACEP Clinical Policy: Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 09 – September 2022

Dr. Leu is an ultrasound fellow at Highland Hospital.

Dr. Mantuani is the ultrasound fellowship director at Highland Hospital.

Dr. Sobrero is an ultrasound fellow at Highland Hospital.

Dr. Nagdev is director of emergency ultrasound at Highland Hospital.

References

  1. Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Jaffin JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgeons’ use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. J Trauma. 1993;34(4):516–527.
  2. Kristensen JK, Buemann B, Kühl E. Ultrasonic scanning in the diagnosis of splenic haematomas. Acta Chir Scand. 1971;137(7):653–657.
  3. Montoya J, Stawicki SP, Evans DC, et al. From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasoundbased traumatic injury assessment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(2):119–126.
  4. Kirkpatrick AW, Sirois M, Laupland KB, et al. Hand-held thoracic sonography for detecting post-traumatic pneumothoraces: the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST). J Trauma. 2004;57(2):288–295.
  5. Galvagno SM Jr, Nahmias JT, Young DA. Advanced trauma life support update 2019: management and applications for adults and special populations. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37(1):13–32.
  6. Gondek S, Schroeder ME, Sarani B. Assessment and resuscitation in trauma management. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97(5):985–998.
  7. Press GM, Miller S. Utility of the cardiac component of FAST in blunt trauma. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):9–16.
  8. Bloom BA, Gibbons RC. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma. [Updated 2022 May 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.
  9. Wilkerson RG, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):11–17.
  10. Mandavia DP, Hoffner RJ, Mahaney K, et al. Bedside echocardiography by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(4):377–382.
  11. American College of Surgeons Trauma Committee. Advanced trauma life support for doctors. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2008.
  12. Friese RS, Malekzadeh S, Shafi S, et al. Abdominal ultrasound is an unreliable modality for the detection of hemoperitoneum in patients with pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2007;63(1):97–102.
  13. Blackbourne LH, Soffer D, McKenney M, et al. Secondary ultrasound examination increases the sensitivity of the FAST exam in blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2004;57(5):934–938.
  14. Thomas B, Durant E, Barbant S, et al. Repeat point-of-care echocardiographic evaluation of traumatic cardiac arrest: a new paradigm for the emergency physician. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2017;1(3):194–196.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: eFASTextended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST)Imaging & UltrasoundPOCUSthree box conceptTrauma & Injury

Related

  • ACEP’s October 2025 Poll: How Often Do You Read Your Own X-Rays?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rapid Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection with POCUS

    June 11, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Employ a Trauma-Informed Approach to Care

    December 7, 2024 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “eFAST 2.0: Refining an Integral Trauma Exam”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603