Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Duty Hour Requirements To Be Subjected to Scientific Evidence (Finally)

By Hans House, MD, FACEP, and Rachel Mutnick, DO | on May 28, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The FIRST trial begins this July and runs until June 2015. Participating hospitals will be randomized to the current restrictions versus more flexible duty hours. All residents (not just interns) in general surgery programs will participate, including off-service residents rotating in surgery. Hospitals in the intervention group will be permitted to eliminate all resident duty hour restrictions except the core limitations of 80 hours per week, minimum of one free day per week, and in-house call no more frequent than every third night. Other than that, anything goes. Presumably, some programs will use consecutive duty periods of 36 hours or more. This could potentially affect emergency medicine residents rotating on a general surgery service during the upcoming academic year. The primary outcome measurements will be patient death or serious morbidity.

You Might Also Like
  • Duty Hour Changes Won’t Change Resident Rotations
  • Curb on Residents’ Hours Linked to Changes in Trauma Care
  • What is Emergency Physicians’ Duty to Report in Cases of Clear and Present Danger?

It will be several years before we see the results from these studies. However, by permitting these randomized controlled trials to go forward, the ACGME and the medical education community is acknowledging that there may be value in having residents spend more time with their patients and that patients may benefit from improved continuity with hospital providers.

References

1. Institute of Medicine. Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.

2. Van Dongen HPA, Dinges DF. Circadian rhythm in sleepiness, alertness, and performance. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2005:435-443.

3. Dawson D, Reid K. Fatigue, alcohol, and performance impairment. Nature. 1997;388:235.

4. Desai SV, Feldman L, Brown L, Dezube R, et al. Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:649-655.

5. Block L, Habicht R, Wu AW, Sesai SV, et al. In the wake of the 2003 and 2011 duty hours regulations, how to internal medicine interns spend their time? J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:1042-1047.


Dr. House

Dr. House is professor of emergency medicine at the University of Iowa and vice chair for education in the Department of Emergency Medicine.

 

Dr. Mutnick

Dr. Mutnick is a resident physician at the University of Iowa.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: Duty Hour RestrictionsDuty HoursInternsMedical EducationResidents

Related

  • ACEP4U: the ACEP/CORD Teaching Fellowship

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How ACEP Councillors are Chosen

    June 28, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Aerospace Medicine Residency Program Pushes the Envelope

    June 25, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Duty Hour Requirements To Be Subjected to Scientific Evidence (Finally)”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603