Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Dr. Kevin Klauer Responds to Criticism of Diagnostic Imaging for Dizziness Myths Article

By Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP | on June 15, 2015 | 1 Comment
Break Room
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Thank you, Alan, for submitting this very important perspective.

You Might Also Like
  • Myths in Emergency Medicine: Diagnostic Imaging for Dizziness
  • Code Black Filmmaker Dr. Ryan McGarry Responds to Criticism of Spinoff TV Series
  • Bust These Imaging Myths
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 06 – June 2015

—Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP
Medical Editor-in-Chief, ACEP Now

Comment

Since a large percentage of posterior fossa strokes are from vertebral artery dissections, what is the value of CT angiograms?

—Chuck Pilcher, MD, FACEP
Kirkland, Washington

Response

Thank you for your question. To provide some additional background for the readership, in general, dissections are responsible for 2 percent of all ischemic strokes but are more of a concern in those under 45 years, representing 20 percent of ischemic strokes in this age group. The annual incidence of spontaneous carotid dissection has been estimated to be 2.5 to 3 per 100,000 while that of vertebral arteries is 1 to 1.5 per 100,000.1,2 The most common symptoms associated with vertebral artery dissection are vertigo (58 percent), headache (51 percent), and neck pain (46 percent).2 Although CT angiography may demonstrate a vertebral artery dissection, MRI/MRA is the preferred diagnostic modality for vertebral artery dissection.2

—Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP
Medical Editor-in-Chief, ACEP Now

Comment

Although it is good to see an emphasis on the diagnosis of the dizzy patient, Dr. Klauer is perpetuating another myth—that “nystagmus is unreliable.” He is right that the mere presence of any kind of nystagmus does not help to differentiate peripheral from central causes of the acute vestibular syndrome. However, that is akin to saying that “the presence of ECG changes is unreliable” for diagnosing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). All abnormalities are not created equal; a flat T wave does not have the same significance as ST segment elevation.

It’s the same with nystagmus. Its mere presence does not always help—but the kind of nystagmus is very helpful to the diagnostician in sorting out the cause of dizziness. Some of the source for this comes from the Chase article, but this article (I was an author) only described presence or absence of nystagmus (unfortunately, this is the way more emergency physicians chart it), but it’s not meaningful.3

In a patient with ongoing dizziness, one should be hesitant to diagnose vestibular neuritis or labyrinthitis if there is no nystagmus. The nystagmus is “direction-fixed”—ie, the fast component always beats to the same side no matter what direction the patient is looking in.

On the other hand, direction-changing nystagmus in this setting means that there is a central process (probably stroke). So does torsional or vertical nystagmus. Patients with peripheral causes will have direction-fixed horizontal nystagmus.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPACEP NowAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansDizzinessImaging and UltrasoundNeurologyPractice ManagementQuality

Related

  • Florida Emergency Department Adds Medication-Dispensing Kiosk

    November 7, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • How Does Emergency Medicine Navigate Consolidation Trends in Health Care?

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP

Kevin M. Klauer, DO, EJD, FACEP, is Chief Medical Officer–hospital-based services and Chief Risk Officer for TeamHealth as well as the Executive Director of the TeamHealth Patient Safety Organization. He is a clinical assistant professor at the University of Tennessee and Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Dr. Klauer served as editor-in-chief for Emergency Physicians Monthly publication for five years and is the co-author of two risk management books: Emergency Medicine Bouncebacks: Medical and Legal and Risk Management and the Emergency Department: Executive Leadership for Protecting Patients and Hospitals. Dr. Klauer also serves on the ACEP Board.

View this author's posts »

One Response to “Dr. Kevin Klauer Responds to Criticism of Diagnostic Imaging for Dizziness Myths Article”

  1. June 21, 2015

    Brian Shippert, DO Reply

    Dr. Klauer,

    I appreciate highlighting the limitations of CT imaging for evaluation of dizziness and the posterior fossa. I also appreciate Dr. Edlow’s highlights of a high quality physical examination. The HiNTS exam (Head Impulse-Nystagmus-Test of Skew) should also be highlighted for obvious cost benefits and for those providers with limited access to magnetic resonance imaging.

    Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):986-96. doi: 10.1111/acem.12223

    Stroke. 2009 Nov;40(11):3504-10. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551234. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603