Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Does Administering Steroids for Cardiac Arrest Lead to Better Neurological Outcomes?

By Ken Milne, MD | on July 21, 2021 | 0 Comment
Skeptics' Guide to EM
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Should steroids be part of your cardiac arrest protocol?

Results

There were five RCTs and two observational studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis (see Table 1). The total cohort consisted of 6,199 patients with a cardiac arrest (90 percent of the cohort came from one retrospective observational study conducted in Taiwan).

You Might Also Like
  • Post-Cardiac Arrest Care System in Arizona Improves Patient Outcomes
  • Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Lower Survival During Nights, Weekends
  • Focus on the Peri-Cardiac Arrest Period to Improve Clinical Outcomes
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 40 – No 07 – July 2021
  • Secondary Outcomes:
    • ROSC: Four RCTs, relative risk 1.32 (95% CI, 1.16–1.50)
    • ICU and hospital LOS: One RCT, no statistical difference
    • Duration of vasopressor and inotropic treatment: No studies
    • Hemodynamic: Two studies in supplemental material
    • Safety: Three studies with no statistical differences

Table 1: Trial Characteristics

Primary Outcome Number of studies Relative Risk (95% CI)
Good neurological outcome 4 RCTs 2.85 (95% CI, 1.39–5.84)
Survival to hospital discharge 4 RCTs 2.58 (95% CI, 1.36–4.91)
Survival of at least 1 year 1 RCT 2.34 (95% CI, 0.83–6.54)

Evidence-Based Medicine Commentary

  1. Few Studies: There were only five RCTs with a total of 530 patients included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, despite cardiac arrest being a common event with high morbidity and mortality.
  2. High Risk of Bias: Only four of the five RCTs could be assessed for bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment 2 Tool. Three of those four were at high risk of bias. The lack of high-quality studies weakens any conclusions that can be drawn from these data.
  3. Single Research Group: The vast majority of the RCT data for IHCA (92 percent) came from two trials by the same group of authors in Greece. One trial was published in 2008 and the other in 2013. This raises the issue of external validity to 2021 and other health care systems.
  4. VSE Protocol: The largest RCT (n=268) assessing corticosteroids for cardiac arrest was part of a VSE protocol for IHCA. The protocol included vasopressin, corticosteroids, and epinephrine rather than corticosteroids alone. This means there has not yet been an RCT that addresses corticosteroids alone for IHCA, though equipoise would be difficult to justify in many care settings. The one RCT for OHCA was from 1984 and failed to show a patient-oriented benefit for dexamethasone when given in addition to standard American Heart Association protocols.
  5. Replication: The RCT from Greece assessing VSE in IHCA has, to my knowledge, not been replicated. The lack of replication is a common problem in science.10

Bottom Line

There is weak direct evidence to support the use of corticosteroids in IHCA as part of a VSE protocol and no evidence to support the use in OHCA.

Case Resolution

ROSC is achieved, and the patient is transferred to the ICU. The patient eventually goes for an angiogram where a stent is place in his left anterior descending coronary artery. The patient makes a full recovery and is discharged home within a week. You decide to do a journal club with your EM residents to discuss the use of corticosteroids for IHCAs and consider whether your hospital should add a VSE protocol.

Thank you to Dr. Ryan Stanton, who is a community emergency physician with Central Emergency Physicians in Lexington, Kentucky, a member of the ACEP Board of Directors, and host of the ACEP Frontline Podcast.

Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on the Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine. 

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: CardiacCardiac ArrestCorticosteroidsResuscitationSteroids

Related

  • Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Life-Sustaining Therapy

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Airway Considerations in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest

    May 9, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Inhaled Corticosteroids An Underused Option for Asthma

    January 5, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

Ken Milne, MD

Ken Milne, MD, is chief of emergency medicine and chief of staff at South Huron Hospital, Ontario, Canada. He is on the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine faculty and is creator of the knowledge translation project the Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine.

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “Does Administering Steroids for Cardiac Arrest Lead to Better Neurological Outcomes?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603