Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Critics of Zohydro ER Approval Suspect Conflict of Interest with Pharmaceutical Industry

By Paul Kivela, MD, MBA, FACEP | on June 10, 2014 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Zohydro ER

In October 2013, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel disclosed that the University of Rochester created two organizations: IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials) and ACTTION (Analgesic Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks). Some alleged potential pay-to-play arrangements involving meetings between pharmaceutical industry representatives and FDA officials occurred with these organizations. Pharmaceutical industries allegedly paid between $20,000 and $35,000 to send one representative to a two-day meeting. Zohydro ER’s original manufacturer may have participated in those meetings. Allegedly as a result of the meetings, the FDA approved a method, known as enriched enrollment, which allowed pharmaceutical companies doing pain studies to remove certain patients who did not respond well to a medication or could not tolerate it before the study began. This made it much easier for pharmaceutical companies to prove their medications were safe and effective.

You Might Also Like
  • Congress Questions Ethics Behind FDA Approval of Zohydro ER
  • Emergency Physicians Urged Not to Prescribe New Opioid, Zohydro ER, Given High Potential for Abuse
  • Emergency Physicians Encouraged to Draw Attention to Pharmaceutical Drug Shortages
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 33 – No 06 – June 2014

On March 10, 2014, several senators called for a special investigation into these pay-to-play allegations against several pharmaceutical companies, physicians, and FDA officials. Sen. Joe Machin (D- WV) and Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) introduced legislation to prohibit the FDA from approving similar drugs unless they are formulated to prevent abuse. Several Republican senators also demanded the FDA release safeguards to prevent abuse.

In March, Purdue Pharma announced it had developed a tamper-resistant version of its hydrocodone product for extended release. Interestingly, the company that markets Zohydro ER announced it will likely have a tamper-proof version of Zohydro ER ready by 2016.

On April 15, 2014, a US District Court issued a preliminary injunction citing that the ban ordered by Massachusetts Gov. Patrick was unconstitutional.

The investigations are just beginning, and the controversy will undoubtedly continue. It is an unintended, and unfortunate, coincidence that Zohydro ER happens to have the word “ER” in it.


Dr. KivelaDr. Kivela is managing partner at Napa Valley Emergency Medical Group, medical director of Medic Ambulance, and part owner of Elan Medical Corporation. He is also the secretary-treasurer of the ACEP Board of Directors.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Topics: AddictionDrug AbuseDrug ApprovalDrug SafetyEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianFDAOpioidPainPatient SafetyPharmaceutical IndustryPrescriptionZohydro ER

Related

  • Q&A with ACEP President L. Anthony Cirillo

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Overcoming Language Barriers in the Emergency Department

    October 21, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Event Medicine: Where Fun and Safety Sing in Perfect Harmony

    October 9, 2025 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Critics of Zohydro ER Approval Suspect Conflict of Interest with Pharmaceutical Industry”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603