Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Critical Issues in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department in Early Pregnancy

By Douglas Bernstein, M.D. and Sigrid A. Hahn, M.D. | on October 1, 2012 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Level B recommendations. (1) Arrange outpatient follow-up for patients who receive methotrexate therapy in the ED for a confirmed or suspected ectopic pregnancy. (2) Strongly consider ruptured ectopic pregnancy in the differential diagnosis of patients who have received methotrexate and present with concerning signs or symptoms.

You Might Also Like
  • How to Handle Possible Ectopic Pregnancies in the Emergency Department
  • Evaluation and Management of Suspected Appendicitis
  • ACEP Clinical Policy Review: Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients in the ED with Asymptomatic Elevated BP
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 31 – No 10 – October 2012

Level C recommendations. None specified.

Methotrexate, administered as a single intramuscular or intravenous dose in the ED, is an alternative to surgical treatment for known or suspected early ectopic pregnancy. Because a single dose of methotrexate is often ineffective, patients may require repeated doses until their b-hCG levels are clearly decreasing. Treatment failure leading to rupture of the ectopic pregnancy is one of the most serious complications of methotrexate therapy; in several cohort studies, more than 20% of patients receiving methotrexate required surgery. Nineteen Class I, II, and III studies were included for discussion. Taken together, these data support a Level B recommendation to arrange outpatient follow-up and to strongly consider ruptured ectopic pregnancy in patients who develop increasing pain and/or signs of hemodynamic instability after methotrexate therapy.

Conclusion

The definitive diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the first trimester remains a clinical challenge. There is growing evidence that clinicians should not rely upon a discriminatory threshold to decide which patients to perform an ultrasound on, nor use the b-hCG to try to predict which patients with an indeterminate ultrasound have an ectopic pregnancy. Despite the clinician’s best efforts, a significant minority of patients will not have a definitive diagnosis after their ED workup, and the management and disposition will need to take into account the patient’s clinical picture as well as other contributing factors, including availability of outpatient follow up.

This clinical policy can also be found on ACEP’s Web site www.acep.org and has been submitted for abstraction on the National Guideline Clearinghouse Web site, www.guidelines.gov.


Dr. Bernstein is a senior resident in emergency medicine at Yale-New Haven Hospital, and is the 2011-2013 EMRA Representative to the ACEP Clinical Policies Committee.

Dr. Hahn is an assistant professor in emergency medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, and is a member of the ACEP Clinical Policies Committee.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPACEP Clinical Policy ReviewClinical GuidelineDiagnosisEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianImaging and UltrasoundOB/GYNPregnancyProcedures and SkillsUltrasound

Related

  • November 2025 News from the College

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Rare Pulmonary Embolism After Routine PIVC Insertion

    September 22, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Code Eclampsia: Navigating the Storm in ED Management

    August 25, 2025 - 2 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Critical Issues in the Initial Evaluation and Management of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department in Early Pregnancy”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603