Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Legal
      • Operations
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Compensation Reports
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • By the Numbers
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • mTBI Resource Center
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • Issue Archives
  • Archives
    • Brief19
    • Coding Wizard
    • Images in EM
    • Care Team
    • Quality & Safety
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Crisis Emergency Department Challenges in a Long Pandemic

By Renée Bacher | on February 15, 2022 | 0 Comment
Features
Share:  Print-Friendly Version
Crisis Emergency Department Challenges in a Long Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen crisis standards of care created and implemented in emergency departments across the United States, from waiting rooms converted into treatment spaces to patients back-transferred from urban hospitals with oxygen shortages to rural centers. While some of these documents have been successful, others have been problematic.

You Might Also Like
  • Where Will Emergency Department Volumes Go Post-Pandemic?
  • Emergency Physicians’ Rights and Responsibilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Look to ACEP’s New Wellness Hub for Support During the COVID Crisis
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 41 – No 02 – February 2022

A paper published in NAM Perspectives last summer on crisis standards of care and COVID-19 noted that the authors were unable to share specific details some colleagues relayed as some of these clinicians suffered “professional retribution for raising these issues or being willing to have open and honest discussion of the tactics that were implemented.”1 It cited improvements needed in the areas of equity and allocation of resources; graduated changes across the care continuum in staffing, dialysis, and respiratory support; and prior crisis standards-of-care work and its contributions during COVID-19.

In the emergency department at the University of Florida Health Jacksonville, instituting crisis standards of care has meant treating patients in waiting rooms with vertical beds as well as forming a Hospital Incident Command Center (HIC) that opened in February 2020 and has remained open since, according to Kelly Gray-Eurom, MD, a professor and assistant dean for quality and safety. 

“During the initial phases of the first surge, the HIC’s team met via Zoom every day at 9 a.m.,” she says. “The team was large and multidisciplinary so communications and planning could be robust.” These team members included all members of the hospital’s C-suite, the dean, medical disaster officer (an emergency physician), patient safety officer, nursing leaders from all areas of the hospital, pharmacy, supply chain, infection prevention and control, media relations as well as representatives from housekeeping and laundry. 

The State of Alaska had a crisis standards-of-care document in development years before the COVID-19 pandemic, but it wasn’t approved until March 2020 when it looked increasingly clear they may need it, according to Anne Zink, MD, chief medical officer for the state and an emergency physician at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center in Palmer, Alaska. The state convened a group of clinicians to adopt a document close to The Minnesota Framework but with edits to adjust for things such as the fact that Alaska does not have a burn unit. The state updated the document last August and is currently in the process of updating it again. But, as helpful as that document has been, it was by no means a panacea. “Those documents cover what happens when you run into things,” Dr. Zink says. “They do not address what happens when you run out of people.” 

Nursing Shortages 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: BurnoutCOVID-19crisis standards of careMass CasualtyWellnessWorkforce

Related

  • Despite Drawbacks, Emergency Medicine Remains a Great Specialty

    January 9, 2026 - 1 Comment
  • Dr. Anne Flower Completes Record-Breaking Running Season

    January 9, 2026 - 0 Comment
  • New ACEP Executive Director Addresses America’s Emergency Docs

    December 23, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: February 2026 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Crisis Emergency Department Challenges in a Long Pandemic”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*



Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603