Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

COVID-19 Therapeutics: What Works, and What Doesn’t?

By Joshua Niforatos, MD, MTS | on August 11, 2020 | 0 Comment
Brief19 Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
3D illustration of coronavirus COVID-19 under the microscope.

In this study, patients were randomized to receive either hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, or usual care. At day 15, there were no differences in clinical status, as adjudicated by a seven-point scale (from complete recovery to death). There were also no signals of benefit in secondary outcomes, including fraction of patients requiring intubation. While believers in hydroxychloroquine have advanced excuses explaining why none of the trials assessing this drug have detected a benefit—ranging from time from onset to randomization to whether or not random ingredients from the periodic table of elements were also included (the most common hail-Mary being zinc)—the fact remains that this treatment has failed to even hint at a benefit in any rigorous analysis.

You Might Also Like
  • Two Generic Drugs Being Tested in U.S. in Race to Find Coronavirus Treatments
  • New Research Broadens Our Understanding of COVID-19 in Kids
  • Vitamin D Fails to Help in Severe COVID-19
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 08 – August 2020

Summary

Dexamethasone and remdesivir appear to help patients with severe or critical COVID-19, while hydroxychloroquine does not help those with mild to moderate illnesses—and preprint data suggest no benefit in more severe cases, as well. However, dexamethasone should not be given to all COVID-19 patients, as there may be harm among patients with less severe illness.

References

  1. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19—preliminary report [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 17]. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2021436.
  2. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, et al. Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19—preliminary report [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 22]. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2007764.
  3. Cavalcanti AB, Zampieri FG, Rosa RG, et al. Hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in mild-to-moderate Covid-19 [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 23]. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2019014.

Dr. Niforatos is emergency medicine resident at The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine in Baltimore and research editor of Brief19.com. Follow him @ReverendofDoubt and follow Brief19 @Brief_19.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: Brief19coronavirusCOVID-19Dexamethasonehydroxychloroquineremdesivir

Related

  • ACEP Member Uses ED, Military Training To Set Standards at FEMA

    August 11, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Dr. Joe Sachs and “The Pitt” Redefine Public Health Education Through Storytelling

    July 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Dr. Joe Sachs and “The Pitt” Are Redefining Public Health Education Through Storytelling

    June 11, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “COVID-19 Therapeutics: What Works, and What Doesn’t?”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603