Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Clinical Guideline Review: Diagnosis of DVT

By Douglas Bernstein, M.D. | on September 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In contrast, the initial test of choice for high-risk patients is venous ultrasound. The guideline states that D-dimer may be used to confirm a negative venous ultrasound but should not be used as the initial test. In all risk categories, including high-risk patients, the combination of a negative venous ultrasound and negative D-dimer negates the need for further testing.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Clinical Policy Review: Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
  • Clinical Guideline Review: Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis
  • ACEP Revises Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Policy
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 09 – September 2013

The guideline recommendations become more complex if results of the diagnostic testing are contradictory. This predominantly arises in the setting of a positive D-dimer but a negative venous ultrasound. In this case, the venous ultrasound should be repeated in one week. This particular recommendation may be the most challenging to comply with for practitioners in emergency medicine, as follow-up appointments, particularly those involving diagnostic imaging, can be difficult to arrange.

Patients should be given clear discharge instructions recommending the repeat ultrasound, and explaining that while DVT is unlikely, the diagnosis has not been conclusively ruled out.

For any patient in whom pretest risk stratification is not performed, the best initial test is a venous ultrasound. If negative, a concurrent D-dimer test or a follow-up venous ultrasound in one week is indicated.

Some special circumstances bear mention. While DVT most typically occurs in the lower extremities, all of these recommendations remain in effect, without significant modification, whether the DVT is suspected in an upper or lower extremity. Also, pregnant patients require a separate diagnostic algorithm given the complications associated with D-dimer testing. In pregnant patients, if the venous ultrasound and D-dimer are both negative, no further testing or treatment is indicated.

However, most of these patients will have a positive D-dimer, and therefore any negative venous ultrasound in a pregnant patient with a positive D-dimer should be confirmed by repeat venous ultrasound in one week.

While on first reading these recommendations by the American College of Chest Physicians may seem complex, the underlying concept is simple: The greater the pretest probability of DVT, the more thorough the testing must be to exclude the diagnosis. The combination of negative venous ultrasound and negative D-dimer, or negative repeat venous ultrasound one week apart, is considered thorough enough to rule out DVT even in high-risk patients. Keeping this general principle in mind can help physicians in diagnosing and determining disposition of patients from the emergency department.

Reference

  1. Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM, et al. Diagnosis of DVT: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e351S-e418S.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPCardiovascularClinical GuidelineCritical CareImaging and Ultrasound

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Clinical Guideline Review: Diagnosis of DVT”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603