Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Case Report: The Ice Pack Test

By Sam Cray, DO; Austin Bennett, DO | on August 8, 2024 | 0 Comment
Case Report
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In addition to pyridostigmine, immunosuppression with glucocorticoids or azathioprine is indicated for acute myasthenic flares. Second-line immunosuppressive agents include methotrexate and cyclophosphamide. For patients experiencing myasthenic crisis, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis are indicated to prevent respiratory collapse due to their rapid onset. Thymectomy is recommended in patients with evidence of thymoma, seronegative disease, or anti-nicotinic-AcH subtype of disease if presentation occurs between the ages of 15 and 50.6

You Might Also Like
  • Case Report Provides Tips for Diagnosing the Rare Tolosa-Hunt Syndrome
  • A Case Report on Tetanus
  • Case Report: Toxic Hypoglycemic Syndrome
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 08 – August 2024

The initial diagnostic workup for patients with MG symptoms should include a complete neurological exam. Additionally, cranial imaging should be used to rule out stroke or intracranial mass, which may present with similar symptoms. Patients should also undergo CT or MR imaging of the thymus, as well as measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone to investigate concomitant autoimmune thyroid disease. Differential diagnosis may include disorders of the neuromuscular junction or the peripheral nervous system, such as Lambert-Eaton Syndrome, botulism, Horner Syndrome, neuromyotonia, or Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Diagnosis may be confirmed by nerve conduction study or by the presence of anti-AcH or anti-MuSK antibodies, although a small percentage of patients are seronegative.8 Historically, checking for symptom improvement in response to intravenous edrophonium, a short-acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, was seen as the gold standard diagnostic test for MG, but this has since been supplanted by serologic and nerve conduction studies due to the concern for serious side effects, including bradycardia and bronchospasm.1 The ice pack test has proven to be an effective initial method of diagnosis for ocular MG. When used to detect MG in patients presenting with diplopia, ptosis, or both, the ice pack test has been reported to demonstrate a sensitivity of 76.9 percent and a specificity of 98.3 percent.9 The authors of this study found the test to remain highly specific, even in patients with co-existing thyroid dysfunction.

Conclusion

Patients presenting with their first MG flare require prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent progression of symptoms. The initial diagnosis of MG is largely clinical. Results from anti-AcH and Anti-MuSK serologic testing may take several days, and treatment should not be withheld for confirmatory testing. In this patient’s case, ice pack testing could have easily been done at the first ED. A correct diagnosis was made quickly at our facility, which allowed for rapid admission and initiation of treatment. With maintenance immunosuppression, the prognosis of individuals with ocular MG is good; most live a normal life expectancy with minimal disability.8


Dr. Cray is a first-year emergency medicine resident at Summa Health in Akron, Ohio, with interests in EMS and wilderness medicine.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: case reportCase ReportsClinicalDiplopiamyasthenia gravisneuromuscularphotophobiaptosis

Related

  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Emergency Department Management of Prehospital Tourniquets

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP’s October 2025 Poll: How Often Do You Read Your Own X-Rays?

    September 30, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Case Report: The Ice Pack Test”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603