Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

C. Difficile, Monospot Tests Often Not Effective in Pediatric Patients

By Landon Jones, MD, and Richard M. Cantor, MD, FAAP, FACEP | on May 14, 2015 | 0 Comment
Kids korner
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Summary: Infants are common asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile. This incidence of asymptomatic carriage is reported to be as high as 60 percent to 70 percent of infants. These asymptomatic carrier rates probably fall to adult comparable levels between 18 and 24 months of age, but the data are very limited. Consider this before ordering a C. difficile test on a 12-month-old infant in the future.

You Might Also Like
  • New Treatment for Recurrent C. difficile Shows Promise
  • Experimental Antibody Reduces Risk of C. difficile Recurrence
  • Oral Vancomycin Curbs C. difficile Recurrence in Some Patients
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 05 – May 2015

Q: What is the sensitivity of a Monospot test in children?

The data are very limited on this topic. Approximately 90 percent of adults develop heterophile antibodies, identified by the Monospot test, following an acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Interestingly, though, only about 50 percent of children develop heterophile antibodies following an acute EBV infection.7

Only about 50 percent of children develop heterophile antibodies following an acute EBV infection.

A study by Sumaya and Ench looked specifically at the rate of positive heterophile antibody responses in children with confirmed cases of EBV.8 The authors evaluated heterophile antibody responses at different ages, stratifying the patients into the following age groups: <2 years, 2–3 years, and ≥4 years. In these age groups, positive heterophile antibody responses were demonstrated in 5.3 percent (1/19), 52 percent (13/25), and 83.6 percent (46/55) of children, respectively. In this single study, the production of heterophile antibodies was near reported adult levels at ≥4 years of age. Overall, children have a relatively poor heterophile antibody response to EBV compared to adults.

A study by Linderholm et al evaluated the sensitivity of a Monospot test in both children and adults.9 The authors arbitrarily broke down the groups into ≤12 years and ≥13 years of age. The sensitivity of the Monospot to detect infectious mononucleosis in the 0–12 age group was 38 percent (3/8) compared to 86 percent in the ≥13 years group. It was a very small sample size, and there were only eight patients included in the sensitivity analysis. Overall, there was a poor sensitivity of the Monospot to detect EBV in children 0–12 years of age.

Summary: Ultimately, the Monospot test shows poor sensitivity in children. The limited data that we have suggest that children don’t make near-adult levels of heterophile antibodies until they are at least 4 years of age, resulting in poor Monospot sensitivity. In regard specifically to the Monospot test, the literature suggests that it is not a good test until they are ≥13 years old. For cases where it is important to diagnose mononucleosis and the patient is ≤12 years old, you may want to get the EBV antibody titers additionally or instead.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: C. diffC. difficileClostridium difficileInfectious DiseaseLab TestPediatricsQuality

Related

  • FACEPs in the Crowd: Dr. John Ludlow

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Nail Bed Injuries: What to Do—or Not to Do

    August 18, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • The Resurgence of Measles, Mumps, and Health Equity Challenges

    August 14, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “C. Difficile, Monospot Tests Often Not Effective in Pediatric Patients”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603