Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Biomedical Ethics & the Law

By Robert C. Solomon, M.D., Medical Editor in Chief, ACEP News | on October 1, 2013 | 0 Comment
Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

But those are my values, and I have neither the right to impose them on him nor any reason to allow that difference to cast doubt on his decisional capacity.

You Might Also Like
  • Who’s in Charge of Our Health? The Ethics of Patient Responsibility
  • ‘Let’s Talk’: Approaches to Refusal of Care in the ED
  • The ACEP Code of Ethics, Past and Future
Explore This Issue
ACEP News: Vol 32 – No 10 – October 2013

Getting back to the particular case in New York, it is important to understand that a high blood alcohol level does not necessarily mean that a patient lacks decisional capacity. People who are habitual drinkers are often lucid and able to carry on coherent and rational conversation with blood alcohol levels that would render me unconscious.

They are also often able to walk with a steady gait and cross streets carefully and safely. So, when we are deciding when a person who has been brought to the ED drunk can be safely discharged, we base that on whether the person can “walk and talk” normally (among other things), not on any number.

So let us assume, for the sake of argument, that the man in the New York case made his intent to leave known to ED personnel rather than deceiving them and slipping out of the building unnoticed. Did they consider his decision to be against medical advice? Did they think it was unsafe for him to leave? Did they assess his decisional capacity? Did they consider restraining him (either with tranquilizing drugs or with physical restraints), thus violating his autonomy in order to protect him? (Such decisions are not always straightforward, because restraints of either kind carry their own risks.) These are all the questions I would ask if I were reviewing the case and judging it for its adherence to principles of biomedical ethics.

While I consider it important to avoid violating the law in my practice of medicine, I consider it even more important to avoid violating principles of biomedical ethics.

If I obey the law but violate professional ethics – and I’m not saying that’s what happened in the New York case, as I think should be clear by now – that will not help me to sleep at night if there is a tragic outcome.


Dr. Solomon has served on hospital ethics committees for 25 years and on the ethics committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians for 15 years. He teaches emergency medicine to residents at Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh and is Medical Editor in Chief of ACEP News. He is a social critic and political pundit and blogs at www.bobsolomon.blogspot.com.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: EthicsIntoxicationLawWisdom of Solomon

Related

  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Management of ED Crowding versus Mass Casualty Incidents: Is There an Ethical Difference?

    August 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Life-Sustaining Therapy

    June 30, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “Biomedical Ethics & the Law”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603