Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Ambulance Lights and Sirens Should Only Be Used When the Benefit Outweighs the Risks

By Anna Bona, MD; and Matt Friedman, MD | on April 3, 2018 | 3 Comments
Latest News
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Sharron Rose Frieburg was 18 years old when a Bloomington Fire Department ambulance ran a red light and struck the vehicle in which she was traveling. She sustained permanent injuries including cognitive impairment and hemiparesis and has persistent difficulty ambulating and speaking.1 Bloomington, Illinois, paid out nearly $5 million to care for Sharon’s lifetime of medical needs. The ambulance was transporting a patient with an ankle injury to the hospital.

You Might Also Like
  • Is Uber the New Ambulance? Financial Concerns May Be Driving This Trend for Many Emergency Department Patients
  • Research Shows Ambulance Equipment Contaminated with MRSA
  • Opinion: Paramedicine Diversion Programs Pose Patient–Safety Risks

Potential Benefit Versus Risk

A medical therapy has associated risks and benefits and the likelihood of each should be weighed with every single administration. That evaluation starts in the field when your local EMS agency is responding to a scene. Just like any other medical management, ambulance lights and sirens (L&S) during response to the scene and transport to the hospital should be considered a medical therapy and prescribed for the patient population with a potential for benefit. Clearly, there are conditions that would benefit from L&S medical therapy in which the potential benefits outweigh the risk of harm. However, in order to improve EMS and public safety, as well as enhance the delivery of patient care, it is important to judiciously evaluate the risks and benefits of all aspects of prehospital care, including L&S. The current status quo that an EMS agency responds to the scene greater than 50 percent of its call volume with L&S or transports patients with L&S greater than 25 percent of the time should not be permitted any longer.

The clinical utility of L&S has been questioned since 1953, when studies revealed that 88 percent of patients arriving by ambulance did not require time sensitive medical management.2 A 1994 study found that limiting L&S to 8 percent of transported patients did not increase the mortality rate. Furthermore, a 2014 study determined the number needed to treat with L&S to prevent one patient’s death is 5,000. With these findings, the safety, role, and proper utilization of L&S must be evaluated and reconsidered.2

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates 4,500 ambulance crashes resulting in 33 deaths annually.3 About 25 percent of the fatalities are of the patients or EMS providers in the ambulance, with the remaining being pedestrian bystanders or other vehicle occupants. EMS providers die from transportation collisions at a greater rate (9.6 per 100,000) than police officers (6.1) or firefighters (5.7). Rear occupants are 2.7 times more likely to die in an ambulance crash, often due to lack of seatbelts. Research has shown that most of these collisions are attributed to human error and thus preventable.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: AmbulanceEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineEmergency PhysicianEMSpedestrianssiren

Related

  • Event Medicine: Where Fun and Safety Sing in Perfect Harmony

    October 9, 2025 - 1 Comment
  • Trauma First Aid at the 2025 Boston Marathon

    September 22, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Prehospital Buprenorphine Is a Powerful Tool in the Opioid-Crisis Fight

    June 4, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

3 Responses to “Ambulance Lights and Sirens Should Only Be Used When the Benefit Outweighs the Risks”

  1. April 8, 2018

    John Smart Reply

    Another unsaid (unknown) variable is the push to keep units available. Thus the perceived need to run L&S for everything to hasten turnaround times.

  2. April 9, 2018

    Jacob Reply

    “Furthermore, a 2014 study determined the number needed to treat with L&S to prevent one patient’s death is 5,000.”

    You may want to re-examine that figure. The study the NHTSA paper cites for that only looked at calls the EMD system in Denmark had triaged as non-emergent that ended with a same-day death, and whether dispatching them as a higher priority would have made a difference in outcome. It did not look at calls dispatched for a L&S response, and it did not account for transport priority.

    They found that of the 94,488 non-emergent dispatches in the review period, there were 152 same-day deaths, and 18 of those were potentially preventable. That’s where they got the NNT=5000 from.

    Interestingly, they found that 13 of those 18 involved incorrect use of the dispatch protocols.

    The original study is “Preventable deaths following emergency medical dispatch – an audit study”, Andersen, et al (2014), and can be found here:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293002/

  3. April 9, 2018

    Kipp Kretschman Reply

    Lights and sirens are OK ,,,not going thru red lights is even better.. Stop look and proceed when safe

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603