Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices

By ACEP Now | on May 18, 2016 | 2 Comments
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ACEP to Sue Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices

“It feels like the 10 meetings that ACEP had with CMS to address the deficiencies with these interim regulations never happened, and that the numerous letters from ACEP, the AMA, state medical societies, EDPMA, the AHA, and others were never given the slightest bit of credence,” ACEP wrote in a letter to CMS dated December 2015.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Poll Shows High Out-of-Pocket Costs Deter Patients from Seeking Emergency Health Care
  • ACEP President Dr. Jay Kaplan Outlines Key Points on Balance Billing in Becker’s Hospital Review
  • ACEP Weighs In on Federal Regulatory Updates on Medicaid Managed Care, Medicare Outpatient Observation, and More
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 35 – No 05 – May 2016

Additionally, CMS noted that it will “consider ways to prevent providers from balance billing” despite the PPACA being very clear that balance billing is a permitted practice.

The December 2015 letter to CMS cautioned, “By adding language promoting a prohibition against balance billing for these claims in the face of a set of benefit standards that effectively permit plans to pay whatever benefits they choose, you have exceeded the authority provided by Congress in the PPACA, which recognized the right of out-of-network providers to receive the reasonable value of their services through, if necessary, balance billing.”

The letter, which has yet to garner a response from CMS, was the last straw prior to ACEP’s decision to take the matter to federal court.

“In light of the EMTALA obligation to provide emergency care regardless of payment, these Final Regulations, by allowing plans to unilaterally determine the reasonable value of these services, encourage an unconstitutional taking of physician and hospital services,” the letter stated. “In the plainest language we can use: these proposed Final Regulations pander to the profit motives of health plans, and they are biased and ill advised. In the strongest terms possible, we recommend that you reconsider this language in the Final Regulations, published or not, before you do irreparable damage to the emergency care safety net on which more than 130 million citizens a year, and health plans, for that matter, rely.”

CMS Rule Affecting Care

Dr. Kaplan said the CMS rule also affects emergency physicians’ ability to access other specialists as it fosters the creation of narrow networks of medical providers, making it more likely that patients will seek care out of network and receive additional bills from medical providers.

In a poll set to be released by ACEP in May, emergency physicians overwhelmingly said health insurance companies are misleading patients by offering “affordable” premiums for policies that actually cover very little.

Eight in 10 emergency physicians said they are seeing patients with health insurance who have sacrificed or delayed medical care because of high out-of-pocket costs, co-insurance, or high deductibles. This is more than a 10 percent increase over six months ago when emergency physicians were asked the same question.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSCost of Health CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineMedicareMedicare & MedicaidRegulation & LitigationReimbursement & Coding

Related

  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

2 Responses to “ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices”

  1. May 21, 2016

    Doc A Reply

    It’s about time this toothless tiger ACEP get some dental implants and play hard ball. Now ACEP needs to get some claws and sue for EMTALA which force us to see patients without fair payment. That is slavery.

  2. May 21, 2016

    Jmitch Reply

    Way to go, ACEP! Let’s go after the rapacious, non-deserving, fee-for-no-service, profit-at-any-cost health insurers!!

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603