Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices

By ACEP Now | on May 18, 2016 | 2 Comments
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
ACEP to Sue Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices

“Allowing insurance companies to use opaque payment methodologies for out-of-network services not only lowers reimbursement for emergency services but transfers massive amounts of financial liability to patients,” said Jeff Bettinger, MD, FACEP, a member of the ACEP/Emergency Department Practice Management Association (EDPMA) Joint Task Force on reimbursement issues and Chair of the Work Group on out-of-network/balance billing issues.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Poll Shows High Out-of-Pocket Costs Deter Patients from Seeking Emergency Health Care
  • ACEP President Dr. Jay Kaplan Outlines Key Points on Balance Billing in Becker’s Hospital Review
  • ACEP Weighs In on Federal Regulatory Updates on Medicaid Managed Care, Medicare Outpatient Observation, and More
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 35 – No 05 – May 2016

“Currently, fee-for-service billing underwrites the vast majority of the practice of emergency medicine,” Dr. Bettinger said. “Allowing insurance companies to pervert the language of the ACA to lower payments removes the foundation for fair compensation of emergency physicians for services that they perform.”

ACEP leaders and staff had meetings with five successive directors of CMS’s Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO). At each meeting and in every correspondence, it was pointed out that, without guidance to insurers to use a transparent database where local charges could be verified, the regulation is unenforceable.

“It is a reminder of when the then attorney general of New York, Andrew Cuomo, took on UnitedHealthcare’s subsidiary Ingenix for manipulating charge data to underpay physicians and the company was fined $300 million,” said Barbara Tomar, ACEP’s federal affairs director. “Those funds were used to set up an open, nonprofit database for charge data, FAIR Health,” she added. “Unfortunately, the interim final rule basically re-creates the same environment for insurers to use black box methods to determine physician payment.”

“It feels like the 10 meetings that ACEP had with CMS to address the deficiencies with these interim regulations never happened, and that the numerous letters from ACEP, the AMA, state medical societies, EDPMA, the AHA, and others were never given the slightest bit of credence,” ACEP wrote in a letter to CMS dated December 2015.

In 2014, ACEP prevailed on the CCIIO leadership, which hired a contractor to review emergency medicine concerns about significant payment reductions. Meanwhile, CCIIO leadership changed for a fifth time, and when the report was finally provided in July 2015, the results were disappointing. Instead of a quantitative analysis of claims data, the study produced a weak qualitative report with equivocal findings. Current CCIIO Director Kevin Counihan downplayed the report but agreed to continue to look into the concerns, asking for more data and more time. Then, in September 2015, ACEP representatives were told that his office would not intervene after all.

The final rule, released in November 2015, caught the emergency medicine community by surprise.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCMSCost of Health CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineMedicareMedicare & MedicaidRegulation & LitigationReimbursement & Coding

Related

  • Navigating the Health Care System in Vietnam with CKD/ESRD

    September 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP 2025 Leadership & Advocacy Conference—Showing Up on Behalf of EM!

    June 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • EM Runs in the Family

    February 26, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

2 Responses to “ACEP Sues Federal Government Over Health Insurer Billing Practices”

  1. May 21, 2016

    Doc A Reply

    It’s about time this toothless tiger ACEP get some dental implants and play hard ball. Now ACEP needs to get some claws and sue for EMTALA which force us to see patients without fair payment. That is slavery.

  2. May 21, 2016

    Jmitch Reply

    Way to go, ACEP! Let’s go after the rapacious, non-deserving, fee-for-no-service, profit-at-any-cost health insurers!!

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603