Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Revises Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Policy

By Stephen J. Wolf, MD, FACEP | on July 17, 2018 | 2 Comments
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Patient Management Recommendations

You Might Also Like
  • Thoracic Aortic Dissection Clinical Policy Approved by ACEP Board
  • ACEP Revises Clinical Policy on Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department
  • ACEP Refines Its Clinical Policy on Psychiatric Boarding
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 07 – July 2018
  • Level A: None specified.
  • Level B: For patients who are at low risk for acute PE, use the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) to exclude the diagnosis without further diagnostic testing.
  • Level C: None specified.

Question 2. In adult patients with low to intermediate pretest probability for acute PE, does a negative age-adjusted D-dimer result identify a group of patients at very low risk for the diagnosis of PE for whom no additional diagnostic workup is required?

Patient Management Recommendations

  • Level A recommendations: None specified.
  • Level B recommendations: In patients older than 50 years deemed to be at low or intermediate risk for acute PE, clinicians may use a negative age-adjusted D-dimer result to exclude the diagnosis of PE. For highly sensitive D-dimer assays using fibrin equivalent units (FEUs), use a cutoff of age × 10 µg/L; for highly sensitive D-dimer assays using D-dimer units (DDUs), use a cutoff of age × 5 µg/L.
  • Level C recommendations: None specified.

Question 3. In adult patients with subsegmental PE, is it safe to withhold anticoagulation?

Patient Management Recommendations

  • Level A recommendations: None specified.
  • Level B recommendations: None specified.
  • Level C recommendations: Given the lack of evidence, anticoagulation treatment decisions for patients with subsegmental PE without associated DVT should be guided by individual patient risk profiles and preferences (consensus recommendation).

Question 4. In adult patients diagnosed with acute PE, is initiation of anticoagulation and discharge from the emergency department safe?

Patient Management Recommendations

  • Level A recommendations: None specified.
  • Level B recommendations: None specified.
  • Level C recommendations: Selected patients with acute PE who are at low risk for adverse outcomes as determined by Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), simplified PESI (sPESI), or the Hestia criteria may be safely discharged from the emergency department on anticoagulation, with close outpatient follow-up.

Question 5. In adult patients diagnosed with acute lower-extremity DVT who are discharged from the emergency department, is treatment with a NOAC safe and effective compared with treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and a vitamin K antagonist (VKA)?

Patient Management Recommendations

  • Level A recommendations: None specified.
  • Level B recommendations: In selected patients diagnosed with acute DVT, a NOAC may be used as a safe and effective treatment alternative to LMWH/VKA.
  • Level C recommendations: Selected patients with acute DVT may be safely treated with a NOAC and directly discharged from the emergency department.

In summary, the evaluation and management of patients with suspected VTE in the emergency department is rapidly evolving and increasingly nuanced. Newer clinical algorithms using PERC and age-adjusted D-dimer may improve the efficiency and effectiveness of evaluations. Similarly, advances in the understanding of whom to treat, in which setting and with what optimal therapy can improve patient-centered outcomes.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansClinical GuidelineGuidelinesVenous Thromboembolism

Related

  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Thrombolytics for Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke

    July 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Outpatient Mgmt. of Adults with Asymptomatic Elevated Blood Pressure

    June 25, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • New Clinical Policy for Adult Patients with Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

    May 7, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

2 Responses to “ACEP Revises Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Policy”

  1. August 4, 2019

    Erik Auf der Heide, MD, FACEP Reply

    This policy needs to define:
    1) all acronyms
    2) low, intermediate, and high risk

    • August 6, 2019

      Dawn Antoline-Wang Reply

      Please visit https://www.acep.org/patient-care/clinical-policies/ to download the full policy.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603