Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Reviews Guidelines on Education, Dehydration, Spinal Motion Restriction

By ACEP Now | on April 10, 2017 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Discussion: Compared to untrained persons, there is evidence that trained first-aid providers are associated with increased survival from trauma, shorter length of hospitalization after burns, prevention of further burn injuries, and stroke recognition.

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Reviews Guidelines on Chest Wounds, Hypoglycemia, Positioning, Oxygen Use
  • ILCOR Guidelines on Asthma, Concussion, Dental Avulsion, and Anaphylaxis Reviewed
  • Review of First Aid Guidelines from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 04 – April 2017

Recommendation: Education and training in first aid should be undertaken to improve outcomes after injury and illness. This is a weak recommendation based on low-quality evidence.

Note from Dr. Stopyra: This recommendation suggests that ancillary ED personnel (greeters, security officers, registration personnel) should be trained in first aid. It also tells us that we should take the lead when we encounter the ill or injured outside of the hospital.

Exertional Dehydration (FA 584)

Recommendation Author: Jessica A. Stanich, MD

Dr. Stanich is a member of the emergency medicine residency training class of 2017 at the Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education/Mayo Clinic.

Question: Among adults and children with exertion-related dehydration (P), does drinking oral carbohydrate-electrolyte liquids (I) compared with drinking water (C) change volume/hydration status, vital signs, development of hyperthermia, development of hyponatremia, need for advanced medical care, blood glucose, or patient satisfaction (O)?

Results: Of 1,751 citations initially identified, 12 studies comparing carbohydrate-electrolyte (CE) liquids with water were included in the final analysis. Studies were rated very low quality to moderate quality and downgraded based upon risk of bias and imprecision.

Outcomes: For the critical outcome of volume/hydration status, results suggested that 3% to 8% CE solutions were superior to water for the rehydration of individuals with simple exercise-induced dehydration, although results were mixed. No difference in core temperature was noted after hydration with 5% to 8% CE solutions versus water. No difference in patient satisfaction, based upon nausea or stomach upset scores, was noted between 3% to 8% CE solutions and water. Additionally, 5% to 8% CE solutions were associated with increased serum sodium two to four hours after hydration. No studies evaluated the important outcomes of blood glucose and need for advanced medical care.

Discussion: First-aid providers must recognize signs and symptoms of dehydration and initiate fluid resuscitation when appropriate. The presence or absence of thirst is a poor surrogate for need for rehydration. Available studies demonstrated conflicting results for the primary outcome of rehydration and limited to no information on critical secondary outcomes.

Recommendations: For simple exertion-related dehydration, 3% to 8% CE therapy is the preferred treatment. Acceptable alternatives include water, 12% CE solution, coconut water, 2% milk, tea, tea-CE, or caffeinated tea beverages (weak recommendation, very-low-quality evidence).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansCervical CollarCervical TraumaDehydrationED Critical CareGuidelineInternational Liaison Committee on ResuscitationNeurologicRecommendationSpinal Motion RestrictionTrauma & InjuryWound Care

Related

  • Nail Bed Injuries: What to Do—or Not to Do

    August 18, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Employ a Trauma-Informed Approach to Care

    December 7, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Traumatic Coronary Artery Dissection Diagnosis Tips

    November 7, 2024 - 1 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

About the Author

ACEP Now

View this author's posts »

No Responses to “ACEP Reviews Guidelines on Education, Dehydration, Spinal Motion Restriction”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603