Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Rejects “Excited Delirium”

By Carmen Lee, MD, MAS | on April 5, 2024 | 0 Comment
Resident Voice
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In a recent systematic review, Strömmer, et al.22 systematically identified arguably all 168 cases of either excited delirium or agitated delirium described in the literature. Sixty-two percent of these were fatal, and the authors found that a diagnosis of excited delirium was nearly 10 times as likely to be applied in cases that were fatalities and nearly five times as likely in those that involved aggressive restraint such as hobbling and physical force. Aggressive restraint was itself also strongly associated with fatality (OR 7.4). Given that this review included most, if not all, of the evidence used previously to justify excited delirium as a fatal clinical entity, the authors conclude that “there is no evidence to support [excited delirium] as a cause of death in the absence of restraint.” With restraints employed in 90 percent of deaths where these diagnoses were applied,”when death has occurred in an aggressively restrained individual who fits the profile … restraint-related asphyxia must be considered as a cause of the death.”

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Member Groups Tackle Hyperactive Delirium, Ultrasound, Workforce, and More
  • Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Delirium in the Emergency Department Have Higher Risk of Death
  • Delirium in the Elderly: A Diagnosis Often Missed
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 04 – April 2024

The 2023 ACEP statement reiterates that there are valid concerns related to hyperactivity and delirium in the setting of emergency assessment and treatment. It also recognizes that these concerns affect not just emergency physicians but many important partners in these settings, including first responders and law enforcement. The complex history of the terminology used to identify and respond to these agitated patients illustrates the power of ACEP to shape national dialogue. This organizational shift represents an opportunity to reflect on the real-world consequences of that influence, and on the responsibility that comes with it.


Dr. Lee is a second-year resident in emergency medicine at Highland Hospital in her hometown of Oakland, California. Her primary interests are in ultrasound, machine learning, and health justice.

References

  1. Gehrke D. Missed calls, close calls mar serial killings case. Miami Herald April 2, 1990:1A.
  2. Bhatia BS, Heisler M, et al. “Excited delirium” and deaths in police custody. Physicians for Human Rights website. https://phr.org/our-work/resources/exciteddelirium/. Published March 2, 2022. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  3. Bearak B. eerie deaths of 17 women baffle Miami. Los Angeles Times. May 14, 1989. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-05-14-mn-413-story.html. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  4. Kurmelovs R. ‘Excited delirium’: how a disputed US term found its way to Australian deaths-in-custody inquests. The Guardian. Jul 3, 2021. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/jul/04/excited-delirium-how-a-disputed-us-term-found-its-way-to-australian-deaths-in-custody-inquests. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  5. Fishbain DA, Wetli CV. Cocaine intoxication, delirium, and death in a body packer. Ann Emerg Med. 1981 Oct;10(10):531-2.
  6. Wetli CV, Fishbain DA. Cocaine-induced psychosis and sudden death in recreational cocaine users. J Forensic Sci. 1985;30(3):873-80.
  7. Rymer R. Murder without a trace. In Health. 1990:55-56.
  8. American College of Emergency Physicians. 2008 council resolution 21: excited delirium. 2008. ACEP website. https://webapps.acep.org/shoppingcart/printreport.aspx?vw=council&councilcode=SA08&re solutionnumber=21. Page 84. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  9. DeBard ML, Adler J, et al. American College of Emergency Physicians white paper report on excited delirium syndrome. Prison Legal News website. Available at: https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/acep_report_on_excited_delirium_syndrome_sept_2009.pdf. Published September 10, 2009. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  10. American College of Emergency Physicians. ACEP reaffirms positions on hyperactive delirium. ACEP website. Available at: https://www.acep.org/news/acep-newsroom-articles/aceps-position-on-hyperactive-delirium. Published October 10, 2023.
  11. Hatten BW, Bonney C, et al. ACEP task force report on hyperactive delirium with severe agitation in emergency settings. American College of Emergency Physicians website. Available at: https://www.acep.org/siteassets/new-pdfs/education/ acep-task-force-report-on-hyperactive-delirium-final.Pdf. Published Jun 23, 2021. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  12. Johnson CK, Foley RJ. Medical examiners group steps away from ‘excited delirium’. The Associated Press website. Published April 3, 2023. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  13. American College of Medical Toxicology. ACMT position statement on end the use of excited delirium. ACMT website. https://www.acmt.net/ news/acmt-position-statement-on-end-the-use-of-excited-delirium/. Published May 1, 2023. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  14. Slevin C, Brown M. Paramedics were convicted in Elijah McClain’s death. The Associated Press website. https://apnews.com/article/elijah-mcclain-death-officers-trial-acef1eabe02b458f53d30d8fe3bf76a4. Published December 23, 2023. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  15. France E, Bourn S, et al. Ketamine investigatory review panel final report. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment website. https://cdphe.colorado.gov/press-release/ketamine-review-committee-publishes-report-with-several-recommendations. Published December 1, 2021. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  16. Valentino-DeVries J, McIntire M, et al. How paid experts help exonerate police after deaths in custody. The New York Times website. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/26/us/police-deaths-in-custody-blame.Html. Published Dec 26, 2021. Accessed March 26, 2024.
  17. Takeuchi A, Ahern TL, et al. Excited delirium. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(1):77-83.
  18. Ho JD, Dawes DM, et al. Effect of position and weight force on inferior vena cava diameter–implications for arrest-related death. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;212(1-3):256-9.
  19. Chan TC, Neuman T, et al. Weight force during prone restraint and respiratory function. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25(3):185-9.
  20. Michalewicz BA, Chan TC, et al. Ventilatory and metabolic demands during aggressive physical restraint in healthy adults. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(1):171-5.
  21. Campbell M, Dakin R, et al. Thoracic weighting of restrained subjects during exhaustion recovery causes loss of lung reserve volume in a model of police arrest. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15166.
  22. Strömmer EMF, Leith W, et al. The role of restraint in fatal excited delirium: a research synthesis and pooled analysis. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020;16(4):680-692.Pathol. 2020 Dec;16(4):680-692.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Deliriumexcited deliriumHyperactive DeliriumLaw Enforcement

Related

  • Readers Respond: ED Boarding Tactics and Excited Delirium

    May 8, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Forensic Evaluation of Motor Vehicle Accidents

    May 6, 2023 - 0 Comment
  • Law Enforcement Information Gathering in the Emergency Department

    May 5, 2023 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP Rejects “Excited Delirium””

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603