Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Rejects “Excited Delirium”

By Carmen Lee, MD, MAS | on April 5, 2024 | 0 Comment
Resident Voice
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

By late 1988, 11 Black women had been found dead in the same area of Miami with low levels of cocaine in their blood. Forensic pathologist Dr. Charles Wetli of the University of Miami had conducted autopsies that he said, “conclusively showed that they have not been murdered.”1,2 He attributed their deaths to a female-specific manifestation of the mysterious phenomenon he had identified in men who had also died after consuming less-than-lethal amounts of cocaine. Antoinette Burns was the twelfth victim, a 14-year-old girl without any evidence of cocaine consumption at all. At the urging of her family and later the police, these autopsies were reexamined and eventually reclassified as homicides attributed to a single serial killer, responsible for as many as 32 murders in the area.3,4

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Member Groups Tackle Hyperactive Delirium, Ultrasound, Workforce, and More
  • Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Delirium in the Emergency Department Have Higher Risk of Death
  • Delirium in the Elderly: A Diagnosis Often Missed
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 04 – April 2024

Dr. Wetli was referring to his and a colleague’s publication of a case report, in 1981, and a seven-case series in 1985 describing the novel “excited delirium syndrome” in individuals under the influence of cocaine, “a medical emergency but with a psychiatric presentation.”5,6 Of the seven, all had been restrained, six by police, and four had been hog-tied or hobbled in a prone position. All seven had died without an “anatomic cause of death,” leaving the reader to infer that the cause had been delirium itself.

It was shortly after these case series that Dr. Wetli, serving as deputy chief medical examiner in Miami, first began attributing the deaths of sex workers to excited delirium in 1986. “For some reason the male of the species becomes psychotic and the female of the species dies in relation to sex” after using cocaine, he said in an interview in the Miami Herald at the time, and speculated that this could be due to genetic traits that were more common in certain populations.7

In the decades since, excited delirium has come to be a frequently-cited cause of death for individuals dying in custody or during altercations with law enforcement. This is despite never being identified by a formal diagnostic framework, such as the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) or the international classification of diseases (ICD), as a valid diagnostic entity.

In 2009, the Excited Delirium Task Force convened by an ACEP Council resolution authored a white paper that endorsed the existence of excited delirium syndrome and made recommendations for identifying and managing it clinically.8,9 According to Dr. Fabrice Czarnecki, one of the members of the original task force, the use of a term borrowed from law enforcement was deliberate. “Excited delirium is a term that has been with the cops for 40 or 50 years,” he said. “My goal in joining the working group was, we don’t want people to die in the street. I personally don’t want people to die in police custody. I want to be involved in training cops to recognize the signs of a medical emergency.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Topics: Deliriumexcited deliriumHyperactive DeliriumLaw Enforcement

Related

  • Readers Respond: ED Boarding Tactics and Excited Delirium

    May 8, 2024 - 0 Comment
  • Forensic Evaluation of Motor Vehicle Accidents

    May 6, 2023 - 0 Comment
  • Law Enforcement Information Gathering in the Emergency Department

    May 5, 2023 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP Rejects “Excited Delirium””

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603