Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Clinical Policy on Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

By Stephen J. Wolf, MD, FACEP | on February 7, 2017 | 0 Comment
ACEP Policy Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Critical Questions and Recommendations

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Refines Its Clinical Policy on Psychiatric Boarding
  • ACEP Clinical Policy on Emergency Department Management of Patients Needing Reperfusion Therapy for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
  • ACEP Board Approves tPA Clinical Policy
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 36 – No 02 – February 2017

Question 1: In ED patients with suspected acute CO poisoning, can noninvasive carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) measurement be used to accurately diagnose CO toxicity?

Patient Management Recommendations

* Level A: None specified.

* Level B: Do not use noninvasive COHb measurement (pulse CO oximetry) to diagnose CO toxicity in patients with suspected acute CO poisoning.

* Level C: None specified.

Recommendations for this critical question are intended specifically to apply to the accurate diagnosis of CO toxicity using noninvasive COHb measurement in patients in the emergency department with suspected exposure, which is a separate clinical question from the utility of noninvasive CO oximetry to screen for CO exposure in undifferentiated populations of ED patients or in the prehospital setting. The latter was not addressed in this policy.

Question 2: In ED patients diagnosed with acute CO poisoning, does hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy, as compared with normobaric oxygen therapy, improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes?

Patient Management Recommendations

* Level A: None specified.

* Level B: Emergency physicians should use HBO2 therapy or high-flow normobaric therapy for acute CO-poisoned patients. It remains unclear whether HBO2 therapy is superior to normobaric oxygen therapy for improving long-term neurocognitive outcomes.

* Level C: None specified.

Five original trials looking at the utility of HBO2 for prevention of neurologic sequelae in CO-poisoned patients now exist. While three studies found no benefit and two found benefit, wide variability of methods and study biases make drawing definitive conclusions about the benefit or harm of using HBO2 versus normobaric therapy for the treatment of acute CO poisoning difficult. Either may be used in the treatment of CO-poisoned patients.

Question 3: In ED patients diagnosed with acute CO poisoning, can cardiac testing be used to predict morbidity or mortality?

Patient Management Recommendations

* Level A: None specified.

* Level B: In ED patients with moderate to severe CO poisoning, obtain an ECG and cardiac biomarker levels to identify acute myocardial injury, which can predict poor outcome.

* Level C: None specified.

CO is known to be cardiotoxic by inducing both tissue-level hypoxia and cellular-level damage. In CO-poisoned patients, acute myocardial injury was found to be the only independent predictor of poor outcome and, when present on presentation, conferred significantly higher long-term all-cause and cardiac-cause mortality.


Dr. Wolf is an associate professor and vice chair for academic affairs in emergency medicine at the University of Virginia School of Medicine in Charlottesville.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ACEPAmerican College of Emergency PhysiciansClinicalClinical GuidelineED Critical CareEmergency DepartmentEmergency MedicineGuidelinePatient CarePoisonpolicyRecommendationToxicologyTrauma & InjuryTreatment

Related

  • Let Core Values Help Guide Patient Care

    November 5, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Case Report: Massive Amitriptyline and Bupropion Ingestion

    October 29, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Toxicology Answer: Oil of Wintergreen

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ACEP Clinical Policy on Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603