Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ACEP Board Addresses “Doctor” Title and More

By ACEP NOw | on March 17, 2020 | 1 Comment
From the College
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The ACEP Board of Directors met Feb. 5–6, 2020, and approved several policy statements and initiatives. To support emergency physicians in their practice, the Board strengthened a policy statement about the use of the title “doctor” in the clinical setting. “ACEP strongly opposes the use of the term ‘doctor’ by other professionals in the clinical setting, including those with independent practice, where there is strong potential to mislead patients into perceiving they are being treated by a physician.”

You Might Also Like
  • ACEP Board of Directors June 2018 Meeting Summary
  • SAEM Board Retires Stroke Policy Statement
  • ACEP Board Defines an Emergency Physician
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 39 – No 03 – March 2020

A new policy statement “Use of Antitussive Medications in the Pediatric Population” was approved, as were the following revised policy statements:

  • 9-1-1 Caller Good Samaritan Laws
  • ACEP Recognized Certifying Bodies in Emergency Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines Affecting Emergency Medicine Practice
  • Emergency Medicine Telemedicine
  • Recognition of Subspecialty Boards in Emergency Medicine
  • Human Trafficking
  • Physician Impairment
  • Retail-Based Clinics
  • Support for Nursing Mothers
  • Use of Patient Restraints

View the policy statements.

Topics: ACEP Board of DirectorsLeadershipPublic Policy

Related

  • ACEP4U: the ACEP/CORD Teaching Fellowship

    November 4, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • ACEP Announces Michael Fraser, PhD, MS, CAE, as Executive Director

    October 28, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Get to Know ACEP’s Leadership

    October 21, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

One Response to “ACEP Board Addresses “Doctor” Title and More”

  1. March 23, 2020

    Robert Bostic, PA-C Reply

    Very much agree that the use of the title of Doctor in ANY clinical setting is misleading and should never be used in a clinical Setting by anyone but a MD or DO.

    In this era of independent practice push for mid level providers, it is imperative, that patients understand who is treating them and what there level of supervision is. If you use the title of “Doctor” it is assumed by the general population that you have a medical degree, not a higher level of educations at the doctorate level in some aspect of health care.

    As a 20+ year Physician Assistance, I am very strict about how I introduce myself and how I let patient address me, which is sometimes very difficult, because of the military presence where I work and that many of my patient, who knew me when I was a hospital corpsman, want to address me as DOC, a title I earned as a submarine independent corpsman, but is not appropriate for me to use as a physician assistance. I feel this is true for all PA-C’s.

    ACEP should aggressively protect the title of Doctor and should approach state legislators about restricting the title to physicians only outside the educational environment unless there is no doubt what the users status is, ie A doctor of religion in the pulpit.

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603