Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

ABEM Is Working on Alternative to ConCert Examination

By Terry Kowalenko, MD | on June 12, 2018 | 0 Comment
Features
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Improving the clinical relevance of the continuing certification process was a key request. A message we received loud and clear was that emergency physicians remain committed to a rigorous program of continuing certification, as long as it helps them become better clinicians. What a remarkable statement! The bottom line for emergency physicians is improved patient care, not self-interest. ABEM is committed to a revised process that helps physicians find learning opportunities and involves assessment that is more clinically focused. This could even involve looking up material much like we do when working in the emergency department.

You Might Also Like
  • ABEM President Dr. Michael L. Carius Discusses Goals, Continuing Quest for Quality Certification
  • New ABEM President Dr. Terry Kowalenko Discusses Certification, Issues Facing Emergency Medicine
  • ABEM’s New President Discusses Continuing Certification
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 37 – No 06 – June 2018

The bottom line for emergency physicians is improved patient care, not self-interest. ABEM is committed to a revised process that helps physicians find learning opportunities and involves assessment that is more clinically focused.

Communicating

Many of the details of the ConCert alternative are not yet defined, but ABEM wanted to let physicians know the importance of what they told us and how we are responding. We envision that the alternative assessments will be shorter (possibly taking an hour or less to complete) and will target one or more content areas (such as trauma). Because relevance was a key issue for physicians, we will attempt to integrate more recent and timely topics into the alternative more quickly. Another consideration is the ability to use of some form of reference material(s). Finally, the feasibility of remote access to the assessment is being explored. ABEM will begin phasing in the alternative assessment in 2020. Over the next year, more and more details will be forthcoming. We also want to hear from ABEM-certified physicians about their ideas and thoughts on improvements.

Maintaining Credential Strength

ABEM is committed to maintaining the integrity and strength of ABEM certification as a credential. Emergency medicine faces many challenges, and those challenges are best addressed by skilled and talented physicians leveraging the strong credential of ABEM certification. ABEM supports using continuing certification as an indicator of quality and patient safety in our struggles surrounding scope of practice. ABEM strongly believes that continuing certification eliminates the need for medical merit badges and state-based CME requirements. We believe that the alternative assessment to the ConCert must ensure the continuing strength of ABEM certification so that emergency physicians can use the credential to their professional benefit and to optimize patient care. We think the ConCert alternative, as well as administering the ConCert more frequently, can address the issues of cost, convenience, and clinical relevance while maintaining the potency of ABEM certification.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ABEMAmerican Board of Emergency MedicineCertificationConCert Examination

Related

  • Why ABEM Publishing Certification Exam Pass Rate Data Could be a Good Thing

    November 12, 2025 - 4 Comments
  • ABEM’s New Physician Certification Portal Includes Waiver Clause

    October 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Reader and Editor Respond: Non-ABEM Certified Emergency Physicians

    August 1, 2025 - 2 Comments

Current Issue

ACEP Now: November 2025

Download PDF

Read More

No Responses to “ABEM Is Working on Alternative to ConCert Examination”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603